Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2703-1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 02:50 PM
Original message
2703-1
I LOVE THIS STAT. Amazing.

This is the republican votes on judicial nominees made by Bush. Talk about LOCKSTEP. Only once over 39 nominees did a republican vote against a Bush nominee, and it was Trent Lott against the first black justice on the 5th circuit ct of appeals.

Nutty.
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
He also said "what goes around comes around." ;) They're biting themselves in the ass. Mr. Carper did great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who was the "1"?
Edited on Thu May-19-05 03:02 PM by paineinthearse
The summary execution will be at dawn.

Did anyone hear Kerry chiding Lincoln Chafee about expressing surprise that Hagle had gotten out of step? "In my four years in the Senate, I've never seen such a thing!"

:rofl:

Chafee is such a rookie.

During the passage...

To get what they want the leadership has acquiesced to outside forces. John Danforth, a greatly respected former Republican Senator, George Bush’s choice as UN Ambassador, and most importantly a respected minister and leader in his church, wrote: “The problem is not with people or churches that are politically active. It is with a party that has gone so far in adopting a sectarian agenda that it has become the political extension of a religious movement.”

Yet despite Senator Danforth’s warning most of my colleagues stay on script in this fight for history, for principle, for rights. They allow our cherished principles to be abused and glossed over as the debate devolves into a competition of hollow sound-bytes. But script and sound-byte should not dictate what happens here. Not here in the United States Senate. Conscience and principle should dictate what happens here. There must be Senators prepared to stand up and do their duty as Senators of the United States, not Senators of their Party.


This is from "lightupthedarkness" and must be the "official" transcript, because the Chafee reference is not there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I find the "1" utterly unbelievable
I can't believe that a single fascist broke lockstep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It was Lott
and the nominee was originally a CLINTON nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. so the "1" was just due to stpuidity then
and he paid the price
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. My favorite, too.
Even the Soviet communist politiburo had more freedom than that!

It reveals gangsterism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. For comparison, what were the Democratic votes on Clinton nominees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithjx Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's actually a good question.
I'm no statistician, and if they hadn't done the work for me, I wouldn't know this stat. But that's a fair point.
KJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. lemmings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AUYellowDog Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-19-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fucking Idiot
No where did the founding fathers specify that the supreme court had an odd number. Burr is a fucking idiot.

Brandon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC