Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A woman running for President in 2008?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:43 PM
Original message
Poll question: A woman running for President in 2008?
A couple of women have been mentioned as possible Democratic candidates for President.

Do you feel that if the Democrats do choose a woman to run it would be a positive or a negative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. 'Positive.'
Would prefer Boxer among mentioned possibilities, but in general it is time we looked to folks other than white males to be in the White House.

After the current president, I think we should opt for an ADULT as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. President Barbara Boxer, that sounds great to me today.
But I'm just learning about her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. If it can't be Kerry, I want Boxer, but I went with "unsure,"
because if there's anything I've learned about this country--it's that its society is more misogynist than ever, and to a large degree, without remorse for being so. Yeah, I've seen "The Contender," and I used to have hope for an egalitarian world filled with gender equity that was safe for people other than white men. but I read the newspapers everday. Would even someone as excellent as Barabara Boxer have a chance in a country like this? The pragmatist in me says it's too big of a risk to take in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I agree with you but voted 'negative.'
Edited on Fri May-06-05 10:20 PM by Hatalles
Namely for the same reason MissWaverly posted. I would like to see a female president but at this time, I don't think it's possible that Bush voters would vote Democrat -- they already know we're the pro-woman party.

It's sad. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think the country is receptive enough
I am a woman, I liked Walter Mondale, he was defeated because his
running mate for VP was a woman, Geraldine Ferraro, I voted for him,
but this country is being marginalized over issues that I thought were laid to rest 90 years ago, seperation of church and state, we
really need a win, we need someone with broad base appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Little known secret: You need to insert a penis to open the launch codes
It's true!

Lyndon B. Johnson came up with the idea to keep his wife from launching an attack while he slept.

Why do you think the penis has been nicknamed "The Johnson"?

This is why we can never have a female president. She wouldn't have any way to open the briefcase ("The Football") containing the launch codes.

The only women qualified would therefore be Ann Coulter or Rue Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. look I know I am being mocked
but I was a big Mondale fan, and I am convinced that his choice for
VP lost the election, if this world was perfect, no one would interfere when gays want to marry, blacks would be able to vote without question and campaign funding and the campaign season itself
would be paired down to prevent wholesale control of government by
lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm sorry, I don't mean to mock you.
It's not your fault (I think) that you don't have a penis.

I was just trying to satarize the idea that somehow one needs the propper plumbing to be President.

Obviously not.

We already have a president without balls who compensates by fondling farm animals.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. great photo
I like how Barney is so relaxed when he's with him-NOT, Barney is a Democrat. I understand what you're saying but I was really fired up
for Mondale and then to see him go down like that, I was young and very idealistic, I learned then that can't whip people over the head with progress, now if a woman was able to emerge that had the popular
approval of the people, like Clinton when he goes into a bookstore, people just run to him, he has the magnetic appeal of the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
47. couldn't she use her huband's 'johnson'? or a cigar? eom
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
50. A female president would never WANT
to open the briefcase, so the issue would never come up.

A woman would never want to do this because women aren't trying to compensate for anything SMALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
41. Seems like a quite a leap to say MOndale lost in 84 because he picked
a woman as VP. She had quite a few problems that were not associated with being a woman... and Mondale had a few of his own too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. We were use to seeing strong women leading other countries,
(Golda Meir, Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher) I don't see it as much of a leap to having a strong woman President of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think the time has come for true equality, run on merits regardless of
gender. It shouldn't freak out anyone today if the candidate is a woman in 2008.

OTOH, I'm in the minority according to this poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Evita Peron, Imelda Marcos
Sorry, just having fun.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ask the voting machines.
They'll tell you the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yes, maybe we could ask a programmer
what is the syntax for B_U_S_H and run someone with a name 1 value off like BRUSH, or BLUSH or even SCHUB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. IMO... a woman should run for VP first
I happen to like Hillary. Not everything about her, but enough. I still wouldn't want her to run for President, we'd lose on the fact she's a woman BEFORE we'd lose on any other fact about her. If she made it as VP to a great candidate in '08, then I could see it being a greater possibility in the coming years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. you mean WIN as vp first?
*cough* Geraldine Ferraro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Prior to Bill Clinton, women never voted as a bloc. Now they do.
I just hope to god they don't nominate Hillary.

I'd be tempted to donate money to the Republican Swiftboat campaign against Hillary, except I'd rather the Republicans waste their own money on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I am against nepotism
why is this family feud, I don't think that GWB is his Dad, and
I don't think Hilary is Bill, I respect Bill, and I think Hilary
is an intelligent senator but I want a clean slate in '08, I want
us to really move on, I don't want a government official's uncle, aunt, brother, son, daughter, wife, sister, mother, father to run for office, I want to judge someone on their ability not their last
name. I think that nepotism has brought us a lot of grief in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'm judging Hillary on just what she's personally said since November
She's becoming Musgrave-Lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I agree with you
But I don't want her wrapping herself up in Bill's presidential appeal, I think that the Bush's do that, it works, but it just irks
me. I can just see her now up on the podium holding his hand, with
the Big Dawg making his usual witty remarks, that's not a real campaign. She has not been a senator for that long either, where her
husband had solid credentials as a governor. Governors tend to get
elected, Senators do not have such broad appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Does that include Chris Heinz, the John-John of the New Millenium?
Edited on Fri May-06-05 10:40 PM by Montauk6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I am talking about presidential candidates
Edited on Fri May-06-05 10:49 PM by MissWaverly
there has been some familys like Daly in Chicago which have solid records, but we are now into to our 12 year reign (maybe if he does his full term) of the Bush family, I want to move on, so if Hilary won, that would mean that the Clinton family would have 12 maybe 16 years of rule, what are we talking about the House
of Windsor here??? This is a DEMOCRACY, and now we have ruling
families, next they have crowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
42. Next they have crowns???
My dear, have you not heard of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Yes, I know but he's not president of the US-yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Respectfully...
...shhh! Please don't call him that. I really like Chris Heinz and want to see him succeed long term. Don't give anyone any bad ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. I would vote for Boxer, I will not vote for Hillary.
But I don't beleive Boxer can win either, as she's a Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'll vote for the person I think is best for the job.
No matter what their gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes and no
Boxer yes.

Hillary, only if she gets the nomination.

Otherwise I'm sticking with John Kerry :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. Barbara Boxer
Barbara Boxer proves that a woman running for President on a Democratic ticket would be a positive thing. Early in the year she was strong enough and willing to take on the Republicans when some of her collegues were not. On three major occasions (the election debate, the Rice Confirmation hearing, and the John Bolton issue)she was willing to stand up for the party.

I would at least like to see her in the primaries. I would like to she her run with Russ Feingold as his Vice President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. The ticket you described would be a winning one imho.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
30. Women usually clean up the mess
Any elected President after Bush leaves
will have a gigantic mess (if we haven't
been nuked into kingdom come). It will
be a near impossible task. I'll vote
for the person who realizes there's
a mess and relishes cleaning it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
31. too important, can't risk it
there is a definite bias against women, no matter how much we try to wish it away. Gonna need all the votes they don't manage to thwart by devious means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. I personally would love a woman president
however, the old white men running this country wouldn't let it happen.

It will happen eventually, I'm sure of it. I just doubt it will in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. That makes me sad when I hear that, the struggle continues under
a fascist government that is trying to undo all the progress of history that doesn't mesh with their ideology from Leo Strauss and warm support from insane religious militarists both in and out of uniform.

Women are secondary to them all, it is taboo to step out of defined roles with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. From the Chisolm Trail to the Boxer Rebellion... positive steps forward
... to victory.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. Judging by the results, I'd say sexism is too prevalent.
Of course, those voting negative may not be sexist, but only recognizing sexism in the voting public.

Ow, now my head hurts!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. If that's the case, sexism needs to be recognized, refuted, and discarded
... rather than perpetuated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Damn straight!
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
36. Blanche Lincoln is the only woman with a chance...eom
Edited on Sat May-07-05 03:02 PM by nickshepDEM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. I largely agree with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gyre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. Don't we enough effin problems?
Now you want to take-on the great unknown for 2008? Are you insane? While we're at it, lets see if we can find a black woman to nominate.

Gyre
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-07-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
40. I am 100% dedicated to supporting a woman in 2008 just because I think
it is time. We have more than enough qualified women to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfaceinhell Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
44. I don't care about the candidates sex in and of itself
And i tend to think that most Americans would feel similarly. Boxer would be a fantastic candidate simply because of her beliefs and her strength of character. She'd doubtless face an outporing of sexist abuse from the right (although of course if Elizabeth Dole was the GOP candidate, the time would suddenly be right for a woman president), but an ugly outburst of misogyny from the other side could help her more than it hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
46. I'm all for
a female candidate for President. But not a big fan of Hillary for a variety of reasons. I guess I don't trust her.

My Dad, vietnam vet, ex-biker, Perot voter, and present Democrat by default, says he'd vote for her or any other woman in a heartbeat. He's 62. I think that says something.

I like Boxer's working class roots, but don't know a lot about her otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
48. i don't think 2008 is the time to 'experiment' with
running a woman for president. that election is way too important. i personally would vote for any of the dem woman in government because they are all more qualified than our present king . . . er, president. hell, laura bush is more qualified than dubya . . . at least she can read.

ellen fl :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'd vote for a woman, but it would be WAY negative
I've said this before, and want to state that my choice of language here is just to make a point:

We just had over half the country vote against fags. Not vote FOR a president, but vote AGAINST fags. Now with that in mind, can you imagine what would happen if we put a skirt up for office?

Never work. Amurka is too fuckin' stupid for it to happen. Give it a few more generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC