Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reporter to McClellan: Laura Bush for Prez in 2008 with George as V.P.?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:24 PM
Original message
Reporter to McClellan: Laura Bush for Prez in 2008 with George as V.P.?
Press Briefing by Scott McClellan

May 2, 2005

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050502-2.html

Q: This is a follow-up on Connie's question, and I assure you there was no collusion. A little bit of a prelude before I get to my question. As you, undoubtedly, have heard, there has been speculation inside the Beltway that if Hillary Rodham Clinton decides to run in 2008 she could possibly choose as a running mate her husband, former President Bill Clinton. And, obviously, after the great boffo performance by the First Lady Saturday night, there is now speculation that she could run, and possibly choose the President to be her running mate. Now, under the 22nd amendment to the Constitution, no President can serve more than two terms. But I think under the 25th, if a President is for any reason incapacitated, the Vice President moves up. Has anybody here addressed this possible conflict --

MR. McCLELLAN: That's quite a scenario you just spun there. But as I said, I think it's too early to talk about the 2006 race, and it's certainly too early to talk about 2008. We've got a lot of important work to do on behalf of the American people, and that's where the President's focus remains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jeff Gannon....
...is getting day passes again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joebert Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was going to ask the same thing.
Edited on Tue May-03-05 11:27 PM by Joebert
Who the hell is being paid to be there, by some "news" organization, that asked a question like that?

Edit: One of the two of can't punctuate, and it's not you. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess they don't understand it is illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It is not illegal.
It is not forbidden in the Constitution at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. It's illegal because the VP has to be Constitutionally capable of becoming
President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, and thus you prove my point.
Edited on Wed May-04-05 09:16 AM by Stand and Fight
No person may be elected to the office of the president more than twice. The key word here is elected. Take for example Lyndon B. Johnson or Gerald Ford. Both had been called to serve after a specific time. For Johnson, it had been after Kennedy had been in office more than two years. For Ford, it had been when Nixon had been in office for less than two years. Had Johnson decided to run in 1968 he would have served a total of more than two terms as president. However, the same cannot be said of Ford -- if he had been elected after taking over, he could have served no more than one term as the elected president. So, your point is null and void. These are loopholes in Consititutional law that allow a person to be president for more than two terms. If Laura Bush was elected president -- gawd forbid -- and George W. Bush was elected as vice-president, the 25th Amendment does apply because George W. Bush meets the requirements for said position. That is, he is a resident of the United States, is over the age of 35, and is a natural born citizen. Nothing in those requirements prevents him from being appointed -- notice, not ELECTED -- president in the event of the president's -- in this example, Laura Bush -- demise. Furthermore, I will do you one better, if Bush were to take any other position in the line of secession, and it came down to it, he would be president again. Look it up. I am 150% certain that I am correct. Therefore, as I stated previously, it would not be illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That's not the wording of the Constitution. The Constitution does not use
Edited on Wed May-04-05 10:42 AM by w4rma
the word "elected".

12th Amendment:
...
"But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."
http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html#Am12

I don't know how the Constitution could have worded that any more clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. It's the 22nd that uses the word "elected"
I agree with you, w4rma. I think that the idea that someone who has been elected President twice can be appointed to the position is ridiculous and illegal.

But the argument for such a scenario (which I think is terribly far-fetched) is that Clinton or Bush are not ineligible to the office of President (so they aren't prohibited by the 12th amendment). They are just ineligible to be elected to the office of President (per the 22nd). If they find some other way to get there, it's okay.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. It IS in the Constitution
Article II Section 1 Part 2

The electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same State with themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crazy Guggenheim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am dumbfounded by that question. Imagine all on speculation.
Edited on Tue May-03-05 11:51 PM by Crazy Guggenheim
Who's this person who followed up to Connie? HAHAHAHA! Is it anyone we should know about? HAHAHAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elsiesummers Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. My mother thinks they'll run Laura if it's against Hillary...
No they won't repeal the 22nd. You never know though about Laura. I told my mom I thought the idea is wacky - but then politics - what with the 2000 selection and George the Chimperor has been quite wacky - so anything's possible. Laura would have to retain her little woman personna while still running for prez - but I think they'd manage that.

I do think it's highly likely Hillary will be the Dem nominee - we at DU who wonder if people like Evan Bayh or Mark Warner of VA will run when the rest of the nation has never heard of these guys - well we underestimate star power. I am quite worried about her as nominee - turnout would be high on both sides, IMO (despite her current negatives at DU). I'm worried about the Republican turnout and the Democratic men who might not vote for a woman. I hope the Dems run a white male because I don't think our country is ready to elect a strong woman or an African American - especially if they are a Democrat. I know that's a sad way to think - but I'm not up for taking chances at this desperate point in history.

I think the Republican nominee will be: (1)Jeb Bush (2)Dick Cheney or (3)Bill Frist.

I'm crossing my fingers that it's Bill Frist because he does not have the "guy you want to have a beer with" thing going on, at all, maybe because of the toupé hair and the corpse like demeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. That was my second thought in response to reading the OP.
The first was, "Oh, please." I'm actually more optimistic about Hillary's chances in '08 than I am about Laura. And if you're familiar with my positing history on this site you know I don't believe we'll ever see another President Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. So Pickles makes a somewhat funny joke about Dumbass jacking off a horse..
...and she's suddenly qualified to be President??

Thank God the Repukes still have some of the delusional people. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Funny how that works, isn't it?
We should put up Jon Stewart if they're going to use that retarded logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burn the bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. the bimbo comes out and says some pre written lines and now she should
be president? Ok, it would be an improvement. However stepford Mrs President, we don't need. I hope they do run her. LOL Has she ever answered a question besides, "I think that's a very important issue, and I know George is working hard on that."

lol Laura for Prezdent! I hope they think it's a good plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. b-but...it was "BOFFO"!
Man...that question just needed a 'divorced from reality' in it somewhere. Who asked it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. the Constitution states that the VP must be able to become pres
That means he can't be a former two-term president, under 35 years of age, or born outside of the US. Other than that, anything goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Wrong.
See my post up-thread. The VP can in fact be a former president. Look at the cases of LFJ and Ford for historical examples. The Constitution states that no person can be elected president twice. The 25th Amendment does not specifically forbid former presidents in the line of succession. It simply states that they meet the qualifications to be president.

The 22nd Amendment states:

1. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President, when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.

2. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress.


Therefore, if George W. Bush were to take over after the second year of Laura Bush's term he could very well be appointed president. He is not forbidden in the Constitution from assuming the office of president in regards to Article II, which states:

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I think you're wrong/ 12th amendment
First off, I didn't say no former president could be Vice President. What I said is that the vice president must be eligible to become president. If a president has already been elected twice, he is ineligible to become president. Vice President's also run for office and are voted on by Electoral College.

Look at the XII amendment, and the last sentence in particular: "The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. Progression: librarian ---> mother and wife to drunks ---> President
Gawd bless Murka!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC