Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman's (R-Ga) quip regarding airplanes raises some concern

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:56 PM
Original message
Congressman's (R-Ga) quip regarding airplanes raises some concern
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 02:56 PM by Roland99
http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/linder_comments_terror_airplanes_429.htm

Rep. John Linder (R-GA): Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Umm. We could probably spend, the entire budget of the United States, on the airline industry. And still be missing some pieces. Now, most of us don't believe that we will ever see an airline hit a building, because the passengers won't allow it. And if an airline is blown up in the air, that is a very bad circumstance for 200 or 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe. Rep. Linder: I would rather spend these fortunes looking for a catastrophe . . . for nuclear weapons. (mumbling and inaudible)

<...>

Rep. Linder: We could spend everything we have protecting airplanes, and still not protect everything. Umm. It is my view that no airplane will ever hit a commercial building -- which is the only value they have in taking out large numbers of people. It is my view that passengers won't allow that to happen. But it is entirely possible that an airplane will blow up in the air, with some (inaudible) or warning today, or some other technique. But that is a very bad circumstance for about 200, 300 people. But it is not a catastrophe.

Rep. Linder: And if we are going to spend all this money, we ought to be thinking about the 1 million, or 2 million-person catastrophe that could be caused by a nuclear device, or a biological device. I think . . . we are doing an awful lot, and maybe too much, on airlines right now. Spending $5 billion dollars a year looking for toenail clippers and box cutters. We should be looking for nuclear devices and I think we should not spend all of our money on the airline industry . .




Uhhh.... :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Drunk?
On drugs?

what? Was this guy in a coma on 9/11? Has he been in a coma since 9/11?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think he's fucked up too
What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Trying to find the full transcript at the House but not finding it
Looking thru video, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty_the_Right Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not sure I understand exactly what he is saying
But I think I agree?

I've been saying since two weeks after 9/11 that airlines should pass out box cutters to EVERYONE on the plane.

It's the only way to be sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, he's forgetting that planes like UPS and FedEx have ZERO passengers
They can be hijacked, too. Maybe even more easily (provided they infiltrate with the utmost in patience.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcfirefighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think he's got a point
We're spending what security money we have in the wrong places.

Of course, he'd probably disagree with the idea that we wouldn't have very much of a security problem if we didn't let hallibectaco make our foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC