Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo / ABCNEWS Poll : Sixty Percent Side With Dems on Judicial Nominations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:40 PM
Original message
WaPo / ABCNEWS Poll : Sixty Percent Side With Dems on Judicial Nominations
Edited on Mon Apr-25-05 03:40 PM by jefferson_dem
WASHPOST /ABCNEWS poll finds 60% of Americans side with Dems in saying Senate rules shouldn't be changed to make it easier to confirm Bush's judicial nominations.

Sludge reporting. No link yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. For 7 judges!
It's just a dumb thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It isn't a dumb thing to do at all...if you're them
Remember, these appointments are for life. The republicans may well realize it will cost them points, politically. But what will we be able to do afterwards? Re-instate the filibuster rule should we ever regain power? Sure, plausible. But you're smokin' too much weed if you think that would also come with a removal of the judges the rights appoint. They'll still be there to rubber stamp any crazy-ass legislation the republicans can funnel to them for review.

It's a kind of sacrifice fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. They are over reaching
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Where would it stop? You know they would change the rules
to suit them from then on. The last time they changed the rules, bush steam rolled a war right through within weeks of the change, the ink wasn't even dry and the bastard was marching into Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThumperDumper Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. It should be 70% because
you can always count on 30% of the population to be the "brainwashed segment" who'll go along with the Republicans on ANYTHING.

All the looney poles always had 30% for Bush. (30% thought Bush won the first debate, remember?)

30% would have voted for Bush if he had killed and ate a child on National TV.

Were 10% "Undecided" or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, to be fair
there are a few people who have genuine problems with the fillibuster in general--things that go beyond the short-sighted Republican thing going on. They probably don't make up ten percet of the population though, so I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fristian Bargain: a new term


Frist traded his soul to the devil in exchange for political power. To “strike a Fristian bargain” is to be willing to sacrifice anything to the Rapturist Right of the Republican Party to satisfy a limitless desire for power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grooch Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. My only hope
is that if they axe the fillibuster and the media starts trumpeting all the conservative judges getting in, there will be enough of a backlash that the theocons will get their heads handed to them come 2006.

I just hope it's not too late by then to undo whatever damage is done to the judiciary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Wall street/business donations will dry up
Axe the filibuster, all other Senate business grinds to a halt, including all corporate legislation.

Frist needs to ask himself if it is really worth risking this for 10 measly radical judges?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC