|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
seahawky (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:33 AM Original message |
How Vulnerable is the U.S. House from losing Republican members in 06 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think we're too far behind to retake it in just one election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 06:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. we've closed the gap in every election since '94. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 09:42 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. And we're still 26 behind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. no, we lost ground in '04 in both the house and senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PurityOfEssence (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 09:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Not in '02 or '04 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. The truth is in the link below. We have gained 1 seat since 1995. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 11:02 AM Response to Reply #16 |
25. No. We gained in 96, 98 and 00, but lost seats in 02 and 04. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pepperbelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 06:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. I stand corrected. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. I am so hopeful this is possible, a better congress ahead then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasquatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:38 AM Response to Original message |
3. If we run attack ads and campaign on Social Security and TS: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. I can't answer that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxbow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:48 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Agreed. It's good to fight the good fight! nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
physioex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 01:54 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Really when the Dems were in power...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
7. Good question: Remember 1994 -- major Dem Leg. Failure (health care) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaitykaity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
8. Howard Dean has two years to work his magic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seahawky (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 02:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Dean can generate young voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 03:53 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Like he did in Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 06:36 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. The trick was to get them to the polls that first time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmcon007 (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
10. a simple and very possible scenario..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 08:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. I agree on the Independents popping up and possible election of some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 03:48 AM Response to Original message |
11. NOTHING is possible until you first SEE it as possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Griffy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 04:11 AM Response to Original message |
13. WE CAN DO THIS... its not that many AND... we get speaker then.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 04:52 AM Response to Original message |
14. The seats have been so gerrymandered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
15. Nothing will change until the voting machines change first. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
THUNDER HANDS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
18. if there's a seismic shift |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
22. I think we will gain some ground, but not take back the House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 11:41 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. If the trend I am seeing here in Ohio is the case, the DNC is going after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Biology (128 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
23. Georgia redistricting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
26. I hope we can gain. I doubt we'll get it back, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
27. This isn't an issue of "picking up seats" incrementally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LimpingLib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
28. Watch out though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bugslsu9 (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-29-05 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
29. There will be Republican members vulnerable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC