Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Political Fallout Over Schiavo Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 05:45 AM
Original message
Political Fallout Over Schiavo Law
bush*'s numbers down the "tubes"

Political Fallout Over Schiavo Law
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/03/23/politics/main682619.shtml


Congressional leaders have insisted their only motivation in getting involved in the Terri Schiavo case was saving a life. But Americans aren’t buying that argument, a CBS News poll finds.

An overwhelming 82 percent of the public believes the Congress and President should stay out of the matter.

Just 13 percent of those polled think Congress intervened in the case out of concern for Schiavo, while 74 percent think it was all about politics. Of those polled, 66 percent said the tube should not be inserted compared to 27 percent who want it restored. The issue has generated strong feelings, with 78 percent of those polled -- wheter for either side of the issue -- saying they have strong feelings.

----snip--------

Public approval of Congress has suffered as a result; at 34 percent, it is the lowest it has been since 1997, dropping from 41 percent last month. Now at 43 percent, President Bush’s approval rating is also lower than it was a month ago.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nominated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweettater Donating Member (674 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 05:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I second the motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Third..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. sound like a "terralert"
is on the way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Maybe not just a terra-lert. Maybe the real thing.
We've been down this road before. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush "misunderestimated" the American people.
And so did I, but in the opposite direction, of course.
There's a bit 'o hope for us yet.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventythree Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. wait until the word gets around
to the fundies that Congress could have saved Terri, for now, by passing a law which stayed the removal of the tube pending a de novo federal review. The tube would have had to go back in, thus sayeth Julian Epstein(?), former counsel for the judiciary committee. He also said they could have made evidentiary changes which would have had the same effect. So later, the court could have ruled their meddling unconstitutional, but for the moment, the tube would be back in -- and there would be less of a liklihood that she would pass on over the Easter holiday -- but then, that was the design, wasn't it? You can froth the 18% up more if she dies than if she doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder
if Turd Blossom will be getting a pay cut over this serious error in judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. NOT ONE DEMOCRATIC SENATOR OPPOSED THIS LAW!
Cowards all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC