|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Palacsinta (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:13 PM Original message |
Re: Bob Casey Jr.'s pro-life position...I need help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Life/health of mother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palacsinta (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Will do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueEyedSon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. go for Pennacchio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palacsinta (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'll check him out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rabid_nerd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yeah he's Pro-Life, So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palacsinta (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Terrific! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 05:32 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I wonder who Rendell thinks he is to judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jesus Saves (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. If he can take out Santorum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. No kidding. I never thought I could support a pro-lifer, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. No litmus test on judicial nominees - maybe that's because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palacsinta (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 05:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. He's not pro-life. He's anti-choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
13. With a Democratic majority in the House and Senate, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissMarple (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
14. Use your common sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jedr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
15. I understand your question, but: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
16. Deleted message |
Mandate My Ass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 08:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. The kind of sick bastard who opposes the death penalty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lars39 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
17. He may not do litmus tests for judges, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 08:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Agreed but: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Palacsinta (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-09-05 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
19. Thanks to all...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safi0 (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-10-05 12:17 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Although I'm not from PA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaliTracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-10-05 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
22. what about birth control? What I've read here is encouraging, yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-10-05 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
23. Single issue voting is almost always bad. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC