however, the poltical and social climate in the 60s/70s was somewhat different. If one were going to use "six degrees of separation," most of these issues were within two degrees:
1) Student unrest. One of the memorable periods of agitation began with the
http://www.fsm-a.org/#happened">Free Speech Movement (FSM) which began on the Berkeley campus, lead by Mario Savio in the fall of 1964. This was primarily in opposition to the conservative policies of the California University Board of Regents and how little control students had over their destinies or the content of their classes.
http://www.fsm-a.org/stacks/GradStudentReport.html">The Berkeley Free Speech Controversy is an excellent recap of the tensions that escalated into violence and eventually swept the nation's universities and colleges. At root cause was virulent anti-Communist sentiments and ongoing investigations into "pinko" professors, etc.
Scholars often dispute when the Sixties began. In California the Sixties began in 1960. The two pivotal events for California students were the anti-segregation sit-ins begun by students in Greensboro, North Carolina in February, and the anti-HUAC protests in San Francisco in May. Bay area students mounted sympathy pickets in response to the first, and turned out by the thousands for the second. These were not the first student protests, nor the only issues of concern that year, but they were a vast escalation over what had gone before. They highlight what were the two chief concerns of the student movement before 1965: civil rights and civil liberties. Source:
http://www.jofreeman.com/sixtiesprotest/berkeleytalk.htm">What Happened at Berkeley: How the Cold War Culture of Anti-Communism Shaped Protest in the Sixties by Jo Freeman
Student unrest continued to intensify as the Viet Nam war escalated and the civil rights movement expanded. Note: students by and large were well-educated, white, and came from middle class backgrounds. Their initial foray into politics was because political expression was banned on most campuses.
2) The Civil Rights Movement. Make no mistake, this was a revolution of the truest sense. It culminated in the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965). This did not mean the job was done, but now implimentation had to occur. Agitation continued as picketing and sit-ins occurred against the hiring practices of commerce -- I remember the campaign against Bank of America in San Francisco, most particularly. However, as the years moved into the 70s, many black activists were becoming far more strident, and black power became the watchword from 1966 onwards.
3) Viet Nam Anit-War movement. Again, this was huge. There were many who were anti-war who didn't hook in with other issues and many who were tied to all of the movements. The draft was as big an issue as was the war itself. But, it was time that eventually was the biggest factor. We were in Nam for 10 years--10 years of vicious combat with as many as 500,000 serving in Nam at any given time.
4) Environmental Movement
5) Women's Liberation
All of these intertwined into a huge generation gap between the boomers and their parents. It was a power struggle that remade must of the social and legal structure of the nation. Some of it was good and some were ideals that failed to take in the bigger picture. The last 20 years has been adjustments and compromises, but the real issues did see change.
The only people now who feel similarly disenfranchised at this point in time is the RW Fundy group. And, they have become the activists. They are pushing to return to the mythical time of the 50s--to before all of the agitation of the 60s/70s.
Part of the problem is that it's really difficult to articulate a clear message about global involvement. Globalization has been insidious and isn't all evil. Many of the liberals of the past believe that the decades of abuse of third world countries by dictators, corporate america, disease, famine, etc., needs to stop. Free trade is one method of accomplishing this.
Whether we like it or not, 9/11 hit a fundamental cord of fear and anger in the U.S. Even if one is opposed to Bush's foreign policies, it's hard to muster up a whole lot of support for the Islamic world. Under Saddam, women had far more rights than they will under the popularly elected Islamic-based government of tomorrow. I never hear anyone say that the Taliban was better. Iran is a mixed bag due to the repressive theocracy ruling it. North Korea has marginalized itself so badly that its people are starving.
Meanwhile our educational system is failing miserably due to wide range of factors, but the upshot is a whole lot of undereducated people who really don't care that they are nearly illiterate.
We have troubles right here in River City and most of them are not sufficient to cause a wide outpouring of RAGE, except outwards against the "terrorists."