Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if it had been Helen Thomas or CBS's John Roberts who were exposed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:47 PM
Original message
What if it had been Helen Thomas or CBS's John Roberts who were exposed?
What if Helen Thomas had been living a double life and had porn pictures of herself posted on the internet? What if Free Republic uncovered that CBS's John Roberts was available for stud service, in addition to filling in for Dan Rather when he is on assignment?

I think I would be shocked and horrified. I don't think I'd be rushing to their defence about their right to privacy and free speech and saying it was nobody's business. Which is what Guckert supporters are doing. IMHO, once you post pictures of yourself with a hard on and solicit clients online for sex, you kinda aren't a private person.

I don't care what sexual persuasion Guckert was -- the fact that he was a prostitute is shocking. The fact that he posted pornographic pictures of himself on the internet with the goal of advertising to "clients" is sickening.

And it's not like this stuff happened in his "reckless youth" -- the web site Americablog cites was active until May 2003! And now "Gannon" says all of this stuff is irrelevant because he has been saved by Jesus Christ. Apparently, pretty recently....

It doesn't get any more sleazy than this. GOPUSA **HIRED** this guy to be a reporter! And he was a SALARIED reporter on their staff. Hell, if I found out someone working for me was a prostitute, I'd be FURIOUS. So why aren't the dogs barking?

And somehow a scuzzy PROSTITUTE got into the WH pressroom time and time and time again! He even managed to direct a question at the POTUS.
It's crazy. Maybe it's just ultra hard core authoritarian hypocrisy, that this guy's brain was so compartmentalized that he never feared that his vocation as a ho for hire would be revealed, after he had set himself up as such a conspicuous presence among the WH press corps. Bizarre. Craziest yet, "Gannon" goaded opponents to "bring it on" -- knowing that all this porn stuff he had done was out there and could be uncovered. Did he think he was protected? Was he praying it would not be revealed, and that he could leave it all behind after he had become a Big Man in "journalism"?

To those who say this is not a big story -- gee, what if it was Helen Thomas or John Roberts? Yeah, it would be a big story. It IS a big story.

It remains to be shown if anyone knew "Jeff"'s two careers simultaneously.
You have to ask, if the WH and GOPUSA and their freeper supporters are so darned innocent, WHERE IS THEIR OUTRAGE?? Why aren't the dogs barking? If I was Bush, or Scotty, and I was truly caught offguard by this, I'd be freaking out and screaming for someone's head to roll for embarassing me with a HO in my midst!! So you have to wonder, why are they soft-pedalling it? Why isn't Wolf Blitzer freaking? i think it's pretty obvious. Their cover as propagandists has been blown BIG TIME -- and now they are scurrying away like cockroaches.

This IS a big story. And it is going to get even bigger. We haven't gotten to the bottom of it yet. It just remains to be seen how "Gannon" learned about Val Plame, wife of that pesky Joe Wilson, was a CIA agent. Was it in his capacity as "journalist" or as a whore?

Was "Gannon" blackmailing someone -- give me access to the WH or I will expose you? That would explain why Scotty tolerated such a conspicious "loose cannon" in the press corps....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. freepers are already all over Helen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. we have no idea what the "elite do".... look at Bohemian Grove
I bet the behavior there ...by much more important people would "curl your hair"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cdb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. We think
We think its a big story. It will just go away. watch....all will be forgotten....you are getting sleepy, your eyelids are getting heavy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Whole Spectrum
would have been displayed.

We would have seen posts saying that it was none of our business and others would have been outraged and in between there would have been those who found it necessary to comment on how Helen looked....

we're a diverse group......it would have been a smorgesboard.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. That's exactly why we've got to keep on it! Plame/outing CIA Agent
Links to Poppy Bush's "Gay Escort Scandal," possible compromiser in the White House Press Corps...how did he get in?

These are important issues. A female Prostitute who was still soliciting who had access to secret Memo from CIA and who got Press Credentials from a non "Establishment" outfit which was just a political arrm of the Repug Party?

Just think about it. We shouldn't wait for MSM to cover their butts when they let this guy "softball Scotty." What's THEIR PROBLEM? They got caught "cold" by Bloggers? Puleeeeeze....they had to be suspicious of this guy and they have better access to search than "Kossacks" do.

This is a MAJOR PRESS SCANDAL in addition to whatever Gannon/Gurket's deal was with WH Insiders.

And...Drudge is silent...Falwell is silent...Coulter/Malken are silent...WHAT????? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Bizarre that they're all silent
It could be the notorious ability of authoritarians to split and compartmentalize their minds, and their genius for hypocrisy.

Or they're freaking out because they had embraced him as one of their own. They loved what he was saying, his recklessness, his brazen style, so much they they never questioned him or anything he ever said. Now "Gannon" is poopooing the idea that anyone could consider him a risk because he so obviously adored the president and his agenda. I disagree. Unstable people are extremely unpredictable, and that's why they are routinely screened out by investigators. I think even little Scotty must have realized, even if he did condone "Gannon" on some level, that the guy was a little nuts and unpredictable and unmanageable.

If they really cared about the security of their beloved president, I think they'd be upset that a demimonde was able to get so close to him.

Security checks are supposed to weed out the unstable. The unstable are considered security risks. Guckert had more kinda of jobs and financial troubles -- clearly a drifter, even if you don't factor in his career in domination prostitution and online solicitation of sex clients, which should have kept him far away from the security around the president.

But I guess in the black/white Bizarro world, you are either all good or all evil, and since he was pro-Bush, that meant he had to be all good. They simply can't comprehend even blatant wrongdoing by one of their own.

And people like Blitzer and Kurtz have now painted themselves into a corner, and stand to lose their "reputations" because they were ideologically blind enough, or perhaps instructed, to stick up for this guy on their broadcasts. Like all liars caught in blatant, damaging lies, they have to deny and cover-up their misjudgement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. the fact that he was able to get into the WH as a reporter
under an assumed name while offering his services (apparently) as a gay escort is a bit of a security breach, doncha think?

consider also that prostitution is illegal - how good was security and background check for the press in the WH?

and considering the repuke/WH take on gays one could also say they weren't promoting good clean moral values by allowing such a man in close contact with the pres....

:puke:

but having seen his photos, i think it unlikely gannon could have managed to support himself as a hooker... he's definitely the type that could only get attractive at closing time after a few too many tequila shots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Note that background check was conducted on Guckert, not "Gannon"
I understand it is procedure to demand the person being investigated report all aliases and pen names.

Am I to understand the FBI/Secret Service KNEW he was using this alias, and never checked "Jeff Gannon" out? Why not?

Guckert was refused a congressional pass. He was already considered too shady. "Jeff Gannon" is even shadier! But somehow he managed to obtain a daily pass. How was this possible? Did he think he was protected by someone within the WH? Could it possibly be blackmail on his part?

Again, I state, if anyone as unstable as a domination hooker got into my presidential presence, and sorry folks, prostitutes ARE considered security risks -- I'd be calling for heads to roll. The fact that so many people are downplaying this story speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Helen works and has always worked for legit news agencies.
That means that the news agency has verifiable subscribers and/or sells enough advertising to PAY the salary of its reporters.


Don't lose sight of the real issues here.

Jim Guckert never deserved to be credentialed by this or any other White House.

If we let freepers make this ONLY about Jim Guckert's gay porn hooker credentials, the real scandal (how he got those credentials) will fade into oblivion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. If dude was truly "born again"
That shit would no longer be on the website. He would have pulled it in horror as a reflection of his illicit past.

Hell no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is so interesting I nominated for Home Page...It's the heart of it
What if it was one of "Ours?" Wouldn't there be outcry to follow this to the ends of the earth...to leave no Democrat "unturned" in the hunt to find out WHY this guy was in the White House that near to Bush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. One more post and we can get this "well reasoned" article on Hompage
where it deserves to be...It's a good read...will someone else click?

There are so many questions about "GannonGate," and the heart of it is often obscured by folks like me and others who are pushing it in desperation.

Chookie has raised questions that are at the "heart of it." It would be a great DU front page for the Mainstreamers...who might get turned off by the Gay Stuff with Pix. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm still waiting to hear from our side in response, but
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 06:59 PM by babylonsister
this current story only broke this pm. Hopefully they're circling their wagons and planning some effective strategy. Cause you're right; if the shoe was on the other foot, the repugs would be preparing for a grand jury to 'get to the bottom of this.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Dem Whip Steney Hoyer want's Special Prosecutor Investigation....
it's over on the "AmericaBlog" website. Our Dems speaking out again...it's great. Also some Repug came out with a good article over there...I didn't have a chance to check it out, yet.

Fortunatly they put a towel over the Private Parts to do with Gannon/Gurket since this afternoon or I would have to issue a warning here....what I saw when it first came out....Ewwwwwwwwwwww...

Now you can sent it to your "Auntie." (Well maybe an "Auntie" who doesn't mind just a little smut...)

Here's the link..but beware...there are still some raunchy pix there.



http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/02/man-called-jeff...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hear you, but....
porn pictures of Helen??



maybe when she was younger....


Helen Thomas was from Sharon, Mercer County, PA. She was a junior at Westminster College in New Wilmington in 1932 when this photograph was taken. Photo from the 1933 Argo, Westminster College yearbook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-05 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why did Talon News take down all of "Gannon's" stories?
Edited on Mon Feb-14-05 08:42 PM by chookie
They say they support him, but why did they strip their web site of EVERYTHING "Gannon" wrote for them? What sense does this make? What does that serve?

They also seems to be covering their tracks in other ways, changing ownship, for example

"But what about Talon News? According to whois records, talonnews.com is owned by Endeavor Media Group in Houston TX -- a company with a PO Box and a fake phone number listing. When checking on endeavormediagroup.com in whois, the same info comes up -- but endeavormediagroup.com is a Forbidden domain. Also, googling "endeavor media group" gets you nothing. It's like this company doesn't exist.

And it didn't -- until Monday.


Endeavor Media Group, LLC (39068802O)
info@endeavormediagroup.com
P.O. Box 891354
Houston, TX 77289
US
Phone: 999-999-9999




Record expires on 07-Feb-2008
Record created on 07-Feb-2005
Database last updated on 07-Feb-2005



So what's the deal? Talon News changed ownership right around the time the Jeff Gannon controversy was about to boil over.

But wait, there's more.

Talon News' "#1 client" GOPUSA.com, is also, as of Monday, owned by Endeavor.

Domain Name: GOPUSA.COM Administrative Contact , Technical Contact : Endeavor Media Group, LLC (39068802O) info@endeavormediagroup.com P.O. Box 891354 Houston, TX 77289 US Phone: 999-999-9999 Record expires on 27-Sep-2007 Record created on 27-Sep-1999 Database last updated on 07-Feb-2005

How to get to the bottom of this? How about checking out the other site Talon seems buddy-buddy with, MensNewsDaily.com. They don't seem to be a part of the Endeavor/Jeff Gannon media empire, but they presumably have at least corresponded with someone pulling the strings."
from
http://www.leadpencil.net/blog/archives/000234.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Kick! Because David Corn compared Gan/Gurk to Helen Thomas!
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 06:03 PM by KoKo01
We've got to keep after this...just like the RW did with "Monica." Don't let this story die, just because it's "too controversial" for Bush or even "possibly" some of our Democrats to deal with.

Let it ALL COME OUT! Our NATION IS AT STAKE! They let a story like this DIE under Reagan/Poppy...now we have another chance...don't let the "Internets" blow it and the MSM try to TRASH US....We have our OWN MEDIA NOW...Let the chips fall where they may...let it ALL come out...

-------------

SEX AND THE CAPITAL

KARLYN BARKER, WASHINGTON POST, JULY 24, 1990: The alleged leader of what authorities have called the largest male prostitution operation in the Washington area surrendered to federal agents yesterday and pleaded not guilty to racketeering charges that have been filed against him and three alleged accomplices. Henry W. Vinson, 29, of Williamson, W.Va., a coal miner's son accused of setting up the homosexual escort service, was arraigned in U.S. District Court here yesterday afternoon after turning himself in to Secret Service agents . . . At a news conference after the arraignment, Stephens said the investigation into the alleged prostitution ring "is concluded" and that the indictment, which was unsealed yesterday, focused on those who allegedly set up the ring rather than on clients who reportedly patronized it. Asked about earlier reports that some of those clients included high-level officials in the Reagan and Bush administrations, Stephens said the investigation had not revealed "additional conduct which suggests criminal conduct on behalf of other people." . . . The Vinson case provoked additional notice after The Washington Times published reports last summer suggesting that the alleged prostitution ring had been patronized by government officials. The Times named as clients several low-level government employees and Craig J. Spence, a Washington lobbyist and party-giver who, the paper said, took friends and prostitutes on late-night tours of the White House. Spence was found dead in a Boston hotel room last fall, and authorities ruled his death a suicide . . . To date, however, investigators have disclosed no evidence linking any high-level government official to the escort service.

archives.] http://washingtonpost.com
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:tKZOoL_hzyAJ:www.n...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC