Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's the first anniversary of Dean's scream.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:03 PM
Original message
It's the first anniversary of Dean's scream.
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, is it too late to send flowers?
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. ih8themedia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. "The scream that may not have been"
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 02:09 PM by BlueEyedSon
A (Rovian?) media smear-job.

First hit on google.com:

The Dean Scream: The version of reality that we didn't see on TV
The scream that may not have been

By ABC News/WABC/abc12
New York — It was the scream Howard Dean says became famous after the media played it nearly 700 times in a few days. Not only that, his camp adds, what we heard on the air was not a reflection of the way it sounded in the room.

Diane Sawyer's script: After my interview with Dean and his wife in which I played the tape again -- in fact played it to them -- I noticed that on that tape he's holding a hand-held microphone. One designed to filter out the background noise. It isolates your voice, just like it does to Charlie Gibson and me when we have big crowds in the morning. The crowds are deafening to us standing there

But the viewer at home hears only our voice.

So, we collected some other tapes from Dean's speech including one from a documentary filmmaker, tapes that do carry the sound of the crowd, not just the microphone he held on stage. We also asked the reporters who were there to help us replicate what they experienced in the room.

Reena Singh, ABC News Dean campaign reporter: "What the cameras didn't capture was the crowd."

Garance Franke-Ruta, Senior Editor, American Prospect: "As he spoke, the audience got louder and louder and I found it somewhat difficult to hear him."

Dean's boisterous countdown of the upcoming primaries as we all heard it on TV was isolated, when in fact he was shouting over the roaring crowd.

And what about the scream as we all heard it? In the room, the so-called scream couldn't really be heard at all. Again, he was yelling along with the crowd.

More: http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/news/012904_NW_r2_group_deanscream.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Funny, Other Democrats Have Given Speeches Using Hand Held Mikes
And the point is- IT WAS A CONCESSION SPEECH!

What the fuck was Dean doing "yelling along with the crowd"?

How is this appropriate for a Concession Speech, where Dean is SUPPOSED to be addressing a NATIONAL audience?

When else has a candidate done such a rally-type speech whilst conceding a state during a NATIONAL ELECTION?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. That was not a concession speech. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. That very night Kennedy shouted at his audience
while warming it up for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL. how do you know this?
did you mark it on your calender? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It's burned into the memories
Of all us Deaniacs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cruadin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. The MSM spin on the "Scream Speech" was always a ...
calculated tactic to take Dean out of the running.

I don't know what group made the decision, but a decision was clearly made that Dean was not to be the nominee. The lock-step coverage of that minor episode was ludicrous at the time, and looks even more ludicrous with the passage of time.

I'll wear my tinfoil hat if I have to, but that was a put-up job from day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Personally, I think the 'scream' was a good thing. Potentially embarassing
yes, but it did a good job making it known that he was passionate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigander4Dean Donating Member (588 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Agreed nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Dean was on a roll that was unexplainable
to the powers that be/are and Dean had to be stopped as it appeared that the powers knew better than the people who to run. While watching the caucases that evening in Iowa I was real surprised how the people quickly went to rooms/areas for their candidate and few were going to Deans. Mostly Kerry and Gephardt?. Something very strange happened just days before in my opinion to diminish Dean??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. a year since the media smear job?
spending a week or so on something as irrelevant as a candidate trying to inspire his supporters, but spending precious little time discussing the merits of a president who lied to push this country to war. Discuss that, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andyhappy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am screaming on the inside
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I still got frostbite on my ass
from doing visibility events that morning in Des Moines. A year already....and everything is the same as it ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. I dunno what corner you were on
but it was -8 where we were.

our viz crew took turns hiding in the hardees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why?
Hasn't any possible "lesson" that can be drawn from the media coverage of it been milked dry by now? There was absolutely no problem with "the scream" itself in it's actual context.

To the extent that it can be "used" against Dean currently that already is being done. It comes up when he is a candidate for something. Once Dean is DNC Chair, for example, there may be a flurry of replays for a month or so and then the media will move on to attacking him for how he is actually doing his job. The hard right may never completely let go of it, just like the hard left will never forget Bush and "My Pet Goat". But most people have moved on to looking at how well Bush is or is not doing now. The same will be true of Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigander4Dean Donating Member (588 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Just a reminder
Who owns the media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Happy anniversary!
:party:

His candidacy was already toast at that point. He had just finished a distant third in Iowa and was behind in the polls in NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pstans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. I prefer the Scream over Bu$h's evil laugh
"Need any wood?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Time flies when you're having fun.

Or NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. Correction: Kerry's win. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. LOL, yeah and how's that working out for you?
I'd forgotten that was when the party sealed our doom for us. "Kerry's turn" indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Just fine thank you.
People have to recognize that some voters actually liked Bush and actually voted for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. It Wasn't The Scream- It Was His Fucked Up, Inappropriate Speech
Just like you don't tell dirty jokes while toasting the bride or air dirty laundry during a funeral... you don't give a RALLY SPEECH WHEN YOU'RE CONCECEEDING A STATE'S VOTE!.'

Dean was not just speaking to his diehard supporters... he was addressing the nation... and it was many Americans first view of him.

He was MANIC from exhaustion. His handlers should have had a small speech ready for him.

And then we can talk about how the Media actually gave Dean airtime AFTER they played his Scream. How the Media allowed him airtime to rehabilitate his image.

What other Democrat has the Media ever done this for?

NONE.

Heck, the Media even apologised to Dean. What other Dem have they done that for?\

NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Apologized? AFTER they played their propaganda thing 500 times?
"oops, so sorry we destroyed you."

What the fuck good does that do?

How is that a favor?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. His Fucked Up Speech Sank Him. Dean Destroyed Himself.
Edited on Wed Jan-19-05 06:41 PM by cryingshame
stop making excuses for the fact Dean buckled under pressure... or wasn't savvy enough to give a CONCESSION SPEECH AND NOT HOLD A RALLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-19-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Didn't Trippi say that he was the one
who advised Dean to give a rally speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. I actually agree with you that
the speech was a mistake, but I hardly think it was the total meltdown that you and the right wingers make it out to be. He recovered from the scream speech with good humor and moved briskly on, establishing DFA and working his heart out for dems. Just out of curiosity, do you see anything good about Dean? You seem to have an almost irrational dislike of the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. again with no facts....amazing
Come on CS, everyone, even the people involved, admit they went after him and he lost the primary BEFORE that speech.

I will never forgive Kerry or Clark for their part in the whole thing. Neither will ever be the democratic nominee for president again. You can bank on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
36. He did both... and this has been pointed out to you.


As I recall it was pointed out to you when you were bashing him at the time. He gave his concession shortly before the rally... but it was hardly covered at all, because the media locked on to the scream and played that instead 700 times.

In what sick twisted dead set on failure world do you live in where after a single loss you DON'T raly the troops for the next primary?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. you don't even have the facts after a whole year to learn them
He gave a concession earlier. His speech was not supposed to be a concession, but a rally of the troops and it was appropriate.
Your continued attacks are pathetic given that you don't even have the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. some thoughts
For weeks prior to the Iowa Caucus the media, at the prompting of the Republicans, had been calling Dean the angry candidate. However, they had no proof of his anger to show the Great American Viewing Public. As the weeks went by they got more and more desperate for proof of Howard's uncontrollable temper.

Proof, or something that with, a bit of judicious editing, could be made to resemble the proof they were so desperatly looking for. The first time the sound clip of Howard Dean's Iowa concession speach it was promoted as proof of Howard's anger. However, as the clip was repeated this introduction was dropped as, let's be honest, the clip was awfull enough that people did not need to told it was awfull. This Propaganda, delivered by shock and awe, was devastatingly effective.

After a couple of days of the media gorging on their long desired evidence somebody realized that they may have been overplaying their hand a bit. Howard got a reprieve and got a chance to redeem himself in the media which, by and large, he did. I think if the NH primary was on Thursday rather than Tuesday he probably would have reclaimed his NH poll lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. 2 more days could not undo a dozen years of knowledge of both men
neighbors to New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Most of New Hampshire didn't know him
the part of New Hampshire he was next to had virtually no people. It would be like claiming I had some knowledge of Indiana or Kentucky politicians due to having been living in a neighboring state. With the exception of those with a national profile I couldn't pick them out of a police lineup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RogueTrooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. His numbers were climbing NYfM
and at the rate they were climbing Dean would have been at the same poll position as Kerry on the Wednesday and by Thursday the would have been enough support to win with by a narrow margin. Dean's number took a beating after "The Scream" and they had already dipped in New Hampshire prior to the Iowa Caucuses. However, the post-scream media work that Dean did ( at the end of the week and over that weekend ) had started to see his numbers climb again. Tuesday was just too soon after the event ( and subsequent coming back ) to overhaul Kerry's lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. nonsense
He out polled Kerry in NH for a long time, until Kerry and the DLC staged their "stop Dean" movement.

Then the rest is history... happy four more years of bush and thank you so much for supporting the candidate guaranteed to lose to the worst President in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Hey chez ain't it funny..

How all the things we said about kerry rolling over for Bush and the pugs turned out to be 100% true and accurate... yet those who supported the punk still refuse to see the truth and instead opt to keep bashing Dean.

The dem dc establishment took Dean out, because they knew he wasn't going to roll over and let Bush steal the election like Kerry was going to do from day f-ing one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Iowa was the endorsement everyone was looking for
Depsite Gore, Harkin, et al. Kerry was nowhere and people had lost confidence in him. Iowa restored that confidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-20-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. ...they spewed rovian marketing shit on him and it makes you wonder
what else they would have done to him if he had been the democratic nominee ....

The low standards of the Rove PR team could still hit new lows ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC