Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Selling Social Security: December 13, 2004.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
illbill Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:33 AM
Original message
Selling Social Security: December 13, 2004.
http://www.realopinion.com/realboards/showthread.php?t=109

Noticed Social Security has been off much debate lately. Dean Baker,co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, sums it up very well in this essay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevebreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. If you like that you should really check out the Baker/Wiebrot book
" Social Security the phony crises"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. and the elderly will be looked upon as nothing better than those
welfare recipients.

The most successful social program ever, giving independance to those retirees or elderly, or disabled, even though it continues to dribble down each year and provides fewer medical benefits, or at best, the minimum.

It signifies the end of a nation that cared about it's elderly enough to spare them becoming a burden on their children, which most that I know, view as anathema. Now it seems, those children would as soon throw them out,(I don't think they will consider taking them in--state nursing homes would be better?)because they bought what Republicans have been pushing for the past twenty or thirty years--under the guise of "less government" is better, and that is that their own retirement is in jeapardy because they are paying their money to pay for old people who have the nerve to live on their money.

It also signifies a country where the young have taken up arms against these elderly recipients, who have also contributed during their day, to the generation preceding them. This, in favor of more privatization and more money to the corporations putting more control over the life of an average citizen.

more information:

Robert Reich's take

http://bowman.typepad.com/cubowman/2004/11/robert_reich_on.html

and
http://bowman.typepad.com/cubowman/2004/11/noam_scheiber_o.html

and



"In this illustration, the Nazis demonstrated that the daily cost to the state of maintaining one chronically ill person (5.5 marks) could be better spent supporting an entire healthy German family."

Era: Before WWII




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC