Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The terror alert was raised because of Dean.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:05 PM
Original message
The terror alert was raised because of Dean.
Many people here believe that Dean is the one Bushco wants. Well I think the alert was raised to help Dean. They raised it so Dean can say: "See we are not safer. I told you. They are wrong I am right." This is another brilliant Rove trick.

:tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat::tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're joking right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. :)
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. We all know you hate Dean....
so why should we enage in legitimate conversation? I prefer to support the democrats myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Q: Reverse psychology
Edited on Sun Dec-21-03 03:07 PM by poskonig
Why does it apply when the Republicans supposedly want Dean, but doesn't apply when Dean supporters claim they "fear" him?

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. no no no its reverse reverse REVERSE psychology...er....
never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. A half-Nelson with a back flip.
Something like that, any way... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Party of the People Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It depends on your powers of discernment!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Party of the People Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rove knows who is easiest to
beat in the general election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No one does. Yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Sharpton
Piece of cake for Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. We give Rove waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much credit
the man is as dumb as a bag of hammers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thissideup Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Through the looking glass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Welcome
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thissideup Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Thank you, glad to be here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanger Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. isn't it sad
that we actually take it for granted that the bush administration would manipulate the terror level to impact the democratic primaries. Whether or not this is actually the case, it is sad that they are so low we can accept this possibility without giving it a second thought.

that's why we need anybody but bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hear Dean caused the sinking of the Titanic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. No, No, No
Don't you get it? Rove caused the sinking of the Titanic to support Dean's candidacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. lol
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. funny though . . .
how some Dean supporters on this board jumped on the Bush/Ridge propaganda machine's latest terror alert hype to bolster Gov. Dean's statements about America not safer after Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. You mean the way that
Clark and Kerry supporters jumped on the 2nd "mission accomplished" with "I'm a military guy, you need me"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. The capture of Saddam was real.
The terror alerts have been shamelessly used in the past to frighten Americans into supporting the Bush foreign policy doctrine. What do Ridge's words really mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. The capture of Saddam by Kurds weeks ago is real
There was no "capture" of Saddam by US forces. US forces are still mostly clueless when it comes to analyzing intel on the ground in Iraq and apprehending criminals there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. He's in custody.
That's important. Not the whole ball though. Bush's gang is still inept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. As for the alleged Kurd capture, mouse7
wasn't it Gov. Dean who praised the admin. for the capture. Doesn't your Kurd argument work against the Governor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Well, probably not
I think the whole terror alert system is a bit of a joke frankly, unless they can really increase security based on target information. Basically it gives the illusion BushCo is doing something *real/new* to protect us. And it helps Bush maintain support. While the result may be what you propose (helping Dean), don't think it was planned that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Safer does not mean safe
Nobody said we are totally safe with Saddam captured. This kind of illogical leaping around from one premise to another is exactly why we lose. It's the bigger picture of the ME, world relations and U.S. security that every other candidate is referring to with the capture of Saddam. Not whether I am safer from one day to the next sitting here in my home. If that's the case, forget terrorism and just focus on crime. That would really make me safer. I hope Howard doesn't start down this path. Just more foolish fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. But more dangerous means less safe
No matter how you slice it the Bush Administration just admitted America is less safe today (as of 1:30) than we were for the several week prior to Saddam's capture. That makes Dean's statement categoically correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe DEAN is planning the Terra Attack !!!!
The DU Dean-haters have a new angle to explore ! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shivaji Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. Frankly I am more afraid of an attack by a SUV
since the small town we live in is least likely to be on terrorist attack list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. And with good reason
You are more likely to be killed by a drunk driver, by a hand gun, or by a medical mistake than you are by a boogey.. I mean terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
24. Sad thing is
this place has become so (fill in the blank) that you can't tell when "they" are being sarcastic or if "they" really believe what "they're" saying. In this case, I think "it" really believes this.


Here you go bleachers, all for you:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. No you have it backwards
Actually Bush F***ed up the war on Iraq on purpose to make Kerry look bad because he was so afraid of him.

You surely know that there were WMD's all over the place, and they just won't release the information because it might help Kerry stop Dean.

They have had Osama for months at GITMO in a warehouse with the 50 tons of sarin, the millions of liters of botulinum and a couple of nukes. Once Dean has the nomination all locked up and Kerry drops out you know that Faux news will be there interviewing Osama and putting the weapons on parade.

Those nasty repugs will do anything to avoid Kerry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. Now THAT'S desperation
It was obvious to anyone that watched the day unfold that the alert was given to cover over the breaking news that Kurds captured Saddam, not US forces.

Yes, it was a Rove trick, but it wasn't brilliant. This made Dean look good to all voters, not just the base. Dean was right about national security and Dumbya, the neo-cons, and the centrists were wrong about national security.

The way you set Dean up to do well while helping the far-right is by setting up Dean to do will on an issue important to the base of the party that simultaneously drives away the center and right. Something like tax cuts would be a good example of a wedge issue that could help the far right at the same time. Do something that make Dean look right to the left for wanting to increase taxes to the middle class.

Making Dean look like a brilliant national security analyst was exactly the wrong thing for Rove to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. Poop
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-03 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Locking...
This is inflammatory.

Thanks,
DU Moderators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC