|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:28 PM Original message |
Why didn't the party more aggressively take on the PATRIOT Act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mutley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. because "The Party" voted for it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. Feingold is incumbant and from Wisconsin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 01:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Which is also why Republicans voted for Wellstone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. Why haven't Dem pols .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpsideDownFlag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Because the DLC thought it was the coolest thing since sliced bread. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheswick2.0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. because they were running for office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThorsHammer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
8. Timing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laheina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:52 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Right on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 01:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. It was passed sight unseen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cobalt Violet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
10. Too much triangulation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KnowerOfLogic (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
13. It was a sign of roll-overs to come. What a pathetic bunch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-23-04 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
14. simply said, they believed in it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC