Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean chose a Republican for Chief Justice of Vermont

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:08 PM
Original message
Howard Dean chose a Republican for Chief Justice of Vermont
In 1997, Dean hoped to tap his administration secretary, William Sorrell, for the chief justice slot but couldn’t convince the board that Sorrell’s lack of experience as a judge didn’t disqualify him.

Dean ultimately chose Republican Attorney General Jeffrey Amestoy, and Sorrell became attorney general, a post he’s held ever since.

http://rutlandherald.nybor.com/News/Story/68525.html

If elected president, will he choose Republicans for federal courts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. You realize, don't you, that Jim Jeffords passes for a Republican in VT?
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 06:14 PM by stickdog
And you also realize that this is the same guy who wrote the opinion legalizing civil unions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackson Smith Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Agreed. A republican in Vermont is like John Breaux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. That's right Jeff Amestoy, a Republican
in the Liberal Vermont Republican tradition was an incredibly popular attorney general, to the point that the Dems did not bother running a candidate against him. In the same way that the Dems do not bother running a candidate against Bernie Sanders (our lone Socialist congressman).

We tend to vote on a persons's character and sometimes cross party lines in Vermont, e.g., Amestoy(R), Jeffords (R), Sanders(S), Leahy(D), Aiken(Republican and another Republican Senator from many years ago) are some examples.

And yes, there are good Republicans out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurk_no_more Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. I thought I had read here on DU, that dean and Jeffords traded votes
while jeffords was still a Republican running for Senate and dean was running for Governor, and that Jeffords even had dean signs on his front lawn.

So appointing a Republican doesn't surprise me any more than the Moderate/Centrist way he ran Vermont.

However, appointing one to the high court does raise questions.

Voting Republican for President and letting the voters decide IMO isn't quite as bad as putting one in office bypassing the voters completely, this I do find especially disturbing since if he should become president, he would have the ability to do so again through a recess appointment.


And then there were none!
” JAFO”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Forbid it, Almighty God!
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 06:15 PM by Cuban_Liberal
God forbid that he would name a *shudder* Republican to the bench. We all know no Republican should EVER be on the bench. We need good Democrats like Earl Warren! errr.... never mind. :P


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
45. exactly what I was going to say
Earl Warren
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. With judges, party affiliation matters a lot less
Than judicial philosophy. Every judge has a paper trail of judicial opinions that can be used to gauge where they stand on important issues.

If you don't believe me, consider that two of the most liberal members of SCOTUS, Stevens and Souter, are both Republican appointees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Brennen Warren and Blackman were all Republicans
and were much better than the Democratic White. That Republican authored the civil unions decision and a decision requiring equal funding for schools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good for Dean...
This justice helped author the civil unions bill and is a proponent of civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. David Souter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bill Clinton chose a Republican for Defense Secretary
So what's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, bipartisanship
If this is supposed to be a scathing indictment you're going to have to do better :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1floridademocrat Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. OMG..
He choose a republican??

Why that... I mean WHAT WOULD CLINTON DO??

Oh wait.. he appointed a Republican to his cabinet..

Damn it.. facts always getting in the way

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Vermont Also Got Tougher On Drugs & Crime
and as the population soared he had to build a prison to accomodate the offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You say that like it's a bad thing.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. the problem people have is he talks like being a moderate is a bad thing
when he himself is a moderate

right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. No he talks like being a wimp is a bad thing
Dean has never painted himself as the epitopmie of a leftist. What has has said is that Democrats need to be more assertive and fight back, instead of trying to be Republicans.

Vermont is a very bi-partisan state. Appointing a Republican thereis not like appointing Tom DeLay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. In Washington, one of the best administrators ever was a Republican
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 06:26 PM by Bozola
Ralph Monroe, Secretary of State.

Of course, ol'Ralph could hardly be compared to what passes as a Republican these days.

Intelligent, kind, and competent; he serve his state exceptionally well.

You've got to look at the person, not the label. Geez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I can tell you for a fact that Ralph attended as many if not more
Democrat fundraisers as he did Republican ones. The only Republican I ever voted for in a general election, actually. It was speculated he retired because he didn't recognize his own party any more. Don't blame him. I almost did the same after the 2002 election, and will do so in 2004 if the DLC forces us to lose this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
39. I loved Ralph & I miss the ol'Guy


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wesley Clark raised money for Republicans in 2001
And said that PNAC was a great team that we needed to have in Washington. Even after that he praised Junior as "commander in chief".

Does that mean he would appoint Republicans??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackson Smith Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Lovely, the Dean banner juxtaposed with the Bush-Hitler reference
I'm not surprised.


Keep bashing Clark though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. What bashing?
It was a fair question. Clark has far more Republican ties than Dean does. How would that effect his future appointments, if he were to be elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. So it becomes a matter of how many?
Clark has far more Republican ties than Dean does.

So, who decides how many is too much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. What is funny about your post here is...
Edited on Mon Jan-19-04 06:34 PM by wyldwolf
..the fact that mine is in response to this constant charge.

So, in effect, you're side is going, "Clark raised money for Republicans...

I say, "Dean appointed them..."

You say, "Yeah... well... Clark raised money for Republicans...!"

We keep hearing revelations about Dean's republican-like actions yet you and yours fall back on the same things as though they're new news.

Agree that since they both have had friendly relations and kind words to say about Republicans that they cancel each other out? Or is Dean's cases just "different?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Kicking for the irony...
...or is it hypocrisy? I get so confused here :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funky_bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Kicking again
'cause Wyld beat me to the punch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Let's kick again like we did last summer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurk_no_more Donating Member (582 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. And dean said cheney was his model VP
does that mean we can look for a howard dean/zell miller ticket should he get the nod?


And then there were none!
” JAFO”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Dean does not use litmus tests or party politics
He looks at cases they've tried. I don't mind republican judges as long as they don't belong to the Federalist Society and such. There are pro choice republicans ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
46. That's a big mistake for Dean
We want Democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sly Kal Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. So?
I like Clark and I like Dean. I hope Clark wins and I don't have a problem with either having republican associates and friends. I have republican family and people I work with. Is this a crime in Liberal circles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. President Clinton nominated William Weld as Ambassador to Mexico
and he did this shortly after Weld lost to Kerry. Clinton also had a Republican as Secretary of Defense, William Cohen.

And your point was????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I'd much rather see them in Mexico than on the Supreme Court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. That's the State Supreme Court
Issues involving reproductive rights are decided at the federal level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. I would take Brennan and probably Blackman over any person on
the current Court and over White and Fortas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. Dean almost always chose Prosecutors and Repubs over Defense Attys
http://www.talkleft.com/archives/003739.html
July 21, 2003

I was a public defender in Vermont during part of Dean's tenure. He was openly hostile to the defense function. He once addressed a meeting of defense attorneys by stating that "my job is to make your job as difficult as possible." He is a man of his word, at least on this campaign promise. He did not want to fund public defense.

……Dean has made no secret of his belief that the justice system gives all the breaks to defendants. Consequently, during the 1990s, state’s attorneys, police, and corrections all received budget increases vastly exceeding increases enjoyed by the defender general’s office. That meant the state’s attorneys were able to round up ever increasing numbers of criminal defendants, but the public defenders were not given comparable resources to respond.


http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2003/10/101621.shtml

In a 1997 Vt Press Bureau interview, Howard Dean admitted his desire to appoint judges willing to subvert the bill of rights. Dean stated that he wanted to appoint to the Vermont Supreme Court a justice who would consider "common sense more important than legal technicalities" and "quickly convict guilty criminals". …. it is only these "legal technicalities" that shield a citizen from unconstrained acts of a powerful government. Dean's rush to convict "guilty criminals" is a call to quickly convict the accused without regard for constitutional protections.

........Commentators have universally condemned Dean's policy: "he has casually trashed several hundred years of legal safeguards", Richard Cohen, and, Dean's stance is "anti-due-process", William Saletan. Dean's desire to appoint judges willing to overlook "legal technicalities" (i.e. the Bill of Rights) and his success in appointing such judges should cause concern.



http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles7/Frank_Dean-Death-Penalty.htm

(Dean appointed) state judges who were willing to undermine the Bill of Rights. In a 1997 interview with the Vermont News Bureau, Howard Dean admitted his desire to expedite the judicial process by using such justices to "quickly convict guilty criminals." He wanted individuals that would deem "common sense more important than legal technicalities." Constitutional protections (legal technicalities) apparently undermine Dean's yearning for speedy trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Haven't I seen that EXACT same post before?
I guess it must be like stock footage- trot it out for a little generic Dean bashing at any point where it might be sort of related to the topic....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushclipper Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
29. Since I know you personally, I know this doesn't matter at all to you...
But congratulations once again in showing the hypocrisy of the people who fault Wesley Clark for certain things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Yes, politics as usual, but for those keeping score...
Clark has admitted voting for Nixon and Reagan. But since then he voted for Clinton, Gore, and democrats in the last mid term. He has since become a strong democrat.

Dean was a supporter of Barry Goldwater and attended the Republican Convention that year. He has since become a strong democrat.

Clark had kind words to say about the current administration on several occasions - once at a Republican fundraiser. However, as a paid speaker, he spoke at a Democratic fundraiser later that week.

Dean has had kind words to say about the current administration - including that "Bush is doing a fine job in the war on terrorism" and that Cheney is a "model VP."

I could go on but what would be the point? Dean's actions will just be rationalized and Clark's demonized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
35. I'm a Vermonter, and our Republicans here are like Democrats
There's really very little difference. Many, many Vermont Republicans supported and voted for Civil Unions. Do you have a problem with Republicans who would vote in favor of Civil Unions? I sure don't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. If they're alike, then why not a Dem?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Because Dean says one thing in this campaign and did another as governor.
That song remains the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Who was better Justice White or Justice Brennan?
defend your choice if it is White.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
40. Will he consider republicans for courts? If they are qualified, yes.
As well he should. As well any President should. Qualification is not defined by party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
43. Not an issue
New England Republicans are OK, especially at the state level.

Sorry, wolf... I normally agree with you, but this is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
47. Clark used to be a Republican
Will he help out his old Republican friends if elected president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. #8 rule violation
If you make a factual assertion about a candidate that is not generally accepted to be true, you must provide a link to a reputable source to back up your claim.

So... link?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC