Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why not four Super Tuesday Regional Primaries?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 10:08 AM
Original message
Why not four Super Tuesday Regional Primaries?
Edited on Fri Nov-19-04 10:18 AM by No Mandate Here.
As long as we are talking about Primary election timing, I might as well throw this in front of the whole group.

Why not have four Super Tuesdays, two weeks apart, and rotate the regions every two or four years? Each region would be a time zone (more or less, so the poll hours would be the same each time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. One of the issues would be that only rich/well-funded
candidates would have a shot.

In the last election, this would have meant no Wes Clark for example because he got in late. He struggled anyway, but trying to get ground organizations going in all those states would be a real challenge. Think about the necesary ad buys for these multiple states.

We should always keep access to office open for candidates without the financial resources.

NOTE: Improving and increasing public financing would be one way to deal with this problem and move towards your proposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. How is this much different than how it is now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed, but a guy can make a splash like Dean did in a state
like Iowa early on. Can he do that in 12 states?

I fear that we would always get the rubberstamped candidate the party chose, mush like long ago. As it is now, our base MUST be energized to get a candidate to be accepted.

Now you're thinking, "but we always get the candidate picked anyway--and it's always a well connected party person--and this hand-picked thing works for the republicans so..."

But I would respond by saying that since we really are a coalition party, we have to mobilize different bases and get them to come together. I think Gore failed to do this as a hand-picked candidate. We lost the fringe and even though we won, we lost. I think Kerry did better--yes partly because of bush--in this matter.

I guess I'm trying to hang on to some idealism that a dark hourse can win. Again, I'm not rejecting your idea out of hand, I just fear what kind of choice we'd have after the first SUPER if one guy one nine states--and probably all the media coverage and the nomination--if all nine states would never vote blue anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's why the rotation. If the first primaries were in the Rocky
Mountain time zone, almost all red states, we could see some interesting results- perhaps far different than in the East or West.

Some of the benefits I see are different travel in the long runup before the first primaries, and a small difference in media strategy.

The two year campaigns would go to more places than Iowa and NH. Why should they get all the fun, anyway?

I don't see this as being a disadvantage for the dark horses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneEyrez Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Very interesting idea
I think we need to work on a Voter Bill of Rights that governs how elections can be conducted in this country... right after we save the current election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC