|
No need for something like VNC or pcAW.. those are GUI-based remote support tools, used when you need to see what the user on the other end is seeing. Their primary purpose is not only to allow the remote tech full access, but more importantly to allow them to poke around and see things, as if they were there.
To hack an election, you dont need to see individual PCs.. you just need, as someone above said, to alter the code such that the machine counts differently then it is displaying - without a paper trail, or ability to look at the underlying code, nobody is the wiser.
There a ton of ways to remotely access a PC.. what you saw today was the least sneaky/invasive. When I work on machines, maybe I will launch Comp Manageent or Regisrty Editor on my PC and remotely change settings on another that way.. or telnet in and apply a patch from a command line... or connect to an admin share (full access to entire HD, by default) and add/delete/change files. You never know. I do it every day, and my users dont know unless I need them to know.
An IT dept may also install stealty monitoring software that records periodic snapshots of your screen, or monitors all messages for specific content, or records keystrokes.. you'll never know. We can also monitor all network traffic, get way geeky and intercept net traffic at the packet level while it passes along our network.
Were you put off by what you saw ? Well, be afraid then.. what you saw was the equivalent of an announced search, with you present, with everything done in such a way that you could see it... like the cops with a warrant, maybe even your lawyer present.. what we can do is more like the sneak & peek searches Ashcroft was fond of.. the kind that are initiated in secret, that you never know happened.
|