Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Biggest Problem with "Tort Reform"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 12:23 AM
Original message
The Biggest Problem with "Tort Reform"
As any "evil trial lawyer" or lowly law student like myself could tell you, there's a reason why we subject big business to extensive tort liability.

Tort liability is a safeguard for ordinary people against large, deep pocketed business entities. The theory is, if a business knows it's going to pay out the nose for making an unsafe product, it decreases the chances of them making one.

Conversely, if they do make an unsafe product, if liability claims will cost them more than fixing the problem, they will be motivated to move with all possible haste to fix it, which brings us to the problem with tort reform.

The GOP/big business approved plan for tort reform will put caps on damages that companies, doctors, etc. have to pay for the harm that they or their products cause. In other words, it protects the wrong doer and punishes the injured, but that's not the most frightening part.

The really scary part is, caps on damages has the potential to make it economically preferrable for business entities to pay out legal settlements rather than fix the problem. In a case such as this, given the business world's track record of placing profits over people, does anyone really think their conscience or sense of civic duty will win the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Republicanism believes in personal responsibility for YOU
not for me.

Money is god.

Corporations are the font from which all good flows.

Admitting weakness (damage) is a sin against the cocksure macho sensibility that is America; to sue is to admit one's inferiority, and inferiors should be crushed.

Mercantilism is cruel enough, but the monarchy that makes these guys all misty-eyed is as evil as it is unsustainable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MotownLew Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oops. I thought you said "TART" reform. I love breakfast. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. yup, you are right and we are going to get it whether we like it or not
because the democratic party will not and can not fight the legislation. You would think, knowing they are going to be dead in the water anyway, that they would have fought for a fairly counted election free of BBV problems.... sigh...but they did not and we have not choice but to watch all social reform of the last 60 years be thrown away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. All it does is change the cost/benefit equation.
Tilts it in favor of the corporate bastards.

And I'm a corporate defense lawyer. (We don't want tort reform either!)

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrGonzoLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Congress shall make no law
prohibiting the right of the people to petition the government for the redress of grievances.

There's your challenge. Use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Tort reform decimates donations to the Dems by trial lawyers
I don't know what percentage of donations to the Democrats come from trial lawyers, but I would think it is significant.

If you limit tort awards, you've cut into their income and hence into their donations to the Democrats.

It also makes it economically impossible for an attorney to take on a new client. Like any other business, a law office has ongoing expenses for rent, books, employees, etc. Since plaintiff attorneys work on a contingency basis they get their money on the back end of a case. By dragging out cases as long as possible, defense (insurance) lawyers put pressure on trial attorneys to settle for less than a case is worth. When I worked as a trial lawyer, I soon learned that insurance companies wanted to pay as little as possible as late as possible -- if at all.

This is part of an overall plan to starve the Democratic Party of donations. "Right to work" laws effectively make unions impotent by giving an employee the benefits of union membership without being required to pay dues. Likewise, laws which prohibit unions from giving donations to only one party (usually the Dems) are being pushed.

With the Repugs, there's always a hidden agenda.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keirsey Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-04 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. hidden agenda?


It's not hidden at all.

Grover Norquist on NPR's Marketplace Monday night said that tort reform was a means to an end. They are going to use tort reform to bust trial lawyers who are among the Democrats biggest campaign donors.

Norquist said the goal is not just to defeat Democrats, but to destroy the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC