Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG!! New Iowa poll shows (in order) Kerrey, Edwards, Dean, Gephart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:27 AM
Original message
OMG!! New Iowa poll shows (in order) Kerrey, Edwards, Dean, Gephart
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 12:28 AM by i_am_not_john_galt
no mention of Clark.

BUT,how accurate (historically) can polls of the Iowa caucus be? The caucuses (sp?) are designed to influence votes, versus voting where you presumably have your mind made up ("I'm going to vote for a candidate who's name sounds like mine", for example).

edited to make headline clearer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Never post drunk.
Let this be a lesson to all of you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Shorry
hic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dupe
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, I heard about that poll - on FAUX news
Maybe it was just wishful thinking on their part, since they didn't offer any thing to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. To their credit
they even kind of disclaimed it - basically introducing it as "for what it's worth".

Does anyone know about how historically accurate polling for the caucuses is? Or is the design of the caucuses effective at getting participants to hold off on their decision until the meetings have been held?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is the one done by the Iowa newspaper right Galt?
I am not sure, but someone told me tonight this paper has a good history. I say it could be any of the 4 guys who wins Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The first reply is pretty close to the truth
Not drunk, but kinda brain dead so I didn't catch the details, just the order. I did think it was odd that Clark didn't show better, and did Edwards just kinda come out of nowhere or did the world change over the past 3 days (was on a job and out of touch with the world).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowDawgDemocrat Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Who is John Galt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh I dont think youre drunk
Edwards has come back nicely, as has Kerry, after Kucinich those two are my faves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. Uh, you DO know that Clark's not on the ballot in Iowa, right?
That's why he's not mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Ah. Well then I need some sleep and would a Mod please nuke this thread
for "Dumb Speech" on my part!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. He's on the ballot
He's just not campaigning there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_am_not_john_galt Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. nevermind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC