Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leftcoaster reports gross Gallup GOP LV overweighting!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 01:58 PM
Original message
Leftcoaster reports gross Gallup GOP LV overweighting!
Edited on Mon Nov-01-04 02:02 PM by flpoljunkie
http://www.theleftcoaster.com/

Monday :: Nov 1, 2004

Gallup And Fox (Yes, Fox) Have Bad News For Bush

As we know by now, Gallup released its last national poll last night, and as we expected, in order to preserve its credibility Gallup’s last poll amongst LVs shows last week’s 5% lead for Bush (51%-46%) now shrinking to a 49%-47% lead for Bush over Kerry. Amongst registered voters, Kerry has a 48%-46% lead.

But toss out those results by Gallup. Why? Because take a look at the composition of the LV and RV samples by party ID that Gallup used last night in their poll. I just got the internals from Gallup, and the LV sample they used had a 5% GOP advantage over the Democrats, and Kerry still almost tied Bush.

1573 Likely Voters
1559 In Sample
Bush Leads Kerry 49%-47%

GOP: 624 (40%)
Ind: 389 (25%)
Dem: 546 (35%)

When compared to the 2000 exit poll results, Gallup under sampled Democrats by 4% and over sampled Republicans by 5%, a nifty 9% swing. If the sample was reweighted to more closely follow the 2000 exit poll party ID breakdown of 39% Dem/35% GOP/26% Ind, can you imagine what kind of lead Kerry would have?

more...

Update: Fox's last poll shows the same thing. Call in the vans, Laura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, it sound like we're winning the indys, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confident Donating Member (144 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can you re-weight vs. 2002 turnout (last national election)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-01-04 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. The likely voter scenario
is misnamed. This year registered voters are MORE LIKELY to turn out so there should not be a scenario based on previous empirical evidence. This will be part of the 'lessons learned' media/pollster mea culpas that should be used to further impugn their integrity! Save us from "Gallup" and "the most trusted name in news".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC