Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Clark Pro-Union?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:37 AM
Original message
Is Clark Pro-Union?
He is a Democrat, and I realize I shouldn't have to ask, but when DINOs like Al From at the DLC write articles about the "New Democrat" future without unions, I have to ask.

Clark is pretty socially liberal, and I like his stand on progressive taxation.

Have I missed Clark's plan to strengthen organized labor? Has he come out with policy proposals to increase private sector unionization? Will he support an international living wage and help repeal Taft-Hartley?

Did his "100 Year Vision" have specifics about unions that I missed?

Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's something
Fighting for Labor

Protecting workers' rights to bargain collectively for the greater good

The history of American economic progress is largely the story of laborers who banded together into unions, in order to bargain collectively for the dignity, respect, wages, and benefits they deserve. I understand the lessons that this history provides. And that is why standing up for workers and unions will be one of my highest priorities as president.

President Bush's record on labor is abysmal. He has taken every opportunity to weaken unions and set back the cause of workers' rights. As President, I'll take the important and long-overdue steps to assist American workers achieve better wages and benefits, access to health care, and a greater say in their working conditions. Here's what I'll do:


Raise the minimum wage. The real value of the minimum wage has declined 25 percent since 1979. A living wage for all workers was the right idea back then, and it's the right idea now. I support raising the minimum wage - and ensuring that it keeps pace with the cost of living in the future.

Empower workers to organize. As president I'll push for a "card check" law, requiring employers to recognize unions once a majority of workers have indicated their intent to unionize.

End union-busting. Harassment, intimidation, and firing of would-be organizers is, unfortunately, not yet a relic of the 1930s. It happens today. My administration will be vigilant in identifying and prosecuting such illegal activity.

Retain Federal wage provisions for workers. The government should set a good example for all employers by paying fair wages and benefits. The Davis-Bacon Act requires that federal contractors pay their workers local prevailing wages. The historic Fair Labor Standards Act solidified legal protection for overtime pay. As President, I'll protect these vital safeguards from those who want to dismantle them.

Protect workers on the job. The Bush Administration has instructed the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to ease penalties on employers who expose their workers to hazards on the job. Bush has also attempted to cut funding for OSHA, which employs fewer inspectors now than it did in 1980. These reckless policies put all workers at risk. I support stiff penalties for employers who violate the law, and increased funding for OSHA and its companion research agency. And I'll replace the Bush Administration's weak, voluntary ergonomics standards with real, enforceable rules that protect the health of American workers.

Promote free and fair trade. Trade has the potential to raise living standards both here and abroad, but we must ensure that the terms of trade are fair, and that we are competing on an equal playing field. Labor rights are human rights, and I'll treat them that way -- internationally-recognized core labor standards must be central elements of all new trade agreements. We must also improve our enforcement of labor provisions in existing agreements. Finally, we must be vigilant in our approach to unfair practices outside of the treaty context. For example, Bush has failed to prevent China from manipulating its currency, hurting American workers. As President, I'll do better.

Increase access to health care. My health care plan provides every single American with affordable access to health care. The plan reduces premiums for many who already have insurance through a system of tax credits. For workers without employee-sponsored health care, I also propose a new, low-cost insurance option: access to the same federal health care plan provided to members of Congress.

http://clark04.com/issues/americasworkers/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. End union-busting
Harassment, intimidation, and firing of would-be organizers is, unfortunately, not yet a relic of the 1930s. It happens today. My administration will be vigilant in identifying and prosecuting such illegal activity.

he's focused on this particular point several times during interviews.
takes the issue seriously...
i like clark =)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Union/Schmunion
Let's get him elected, and we'll worry about that later. He's a Dem. He's for the unions. It's a non-issue. If he's soft on the unions, it won't last long. He's needs them; they need him. If we don't elect a Dem, there won't be any unions by 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. His stance as published is as follows....
Empower workers to organize. As president I'll push for a "card check" law, requiring employers to recognize unions once a majority of workers have indicated their intent to unionize.

End union-busting. Harassment, intimidation, and firing of would-be organizers is, unfortunately, not yet a relic of the 1930s. It happens today. My administration will be vigilant in identifying and prosecuting such illegal activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark4VotingRights Donating Member (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "End union-busting."
But that means the end of Wal-Mart!!!

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. There's this from 1996
In his often criticized speech to the graduates of the School of the Americas Clark said this:

WE ALSO HAVE A COMMON RELIGIOUS HERITAGE, WHICH STRENGTHENS OUR NATIONS AND OUR CULTURES. AND BECAUSE WE HAVE THESE COMMON INTERESTS AND HERITAGE, I THINK WE TEND TO BUILD SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS.

INSTITUTIONS LIKE COURTS, JUDICIARIES, LEGISLATIVE BRANCHES -- AS WELL AS TRADE UNIONS, STUDENT GROUPS, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF DOCTORS, TEACHERS AND LAWYERS. THE GROUPINGS OF GOOD PEOPLE WHO WORK TOWARD THE BETTERMENT OF CONDITIONS FOR EVERYBODY.


I think it's interesting to see his view before he was a candidate. I've never heard a republican say anything like that.

http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usamhi/usarsa/SPEECH/cgscspch.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. So how could this guy vote for Reagan!!!
That's a good speech. I feel 10% better. I particularly like his reference to Locke and Bolivar. His talking about dreams. Somebody that doesn't understand that it's all about dreams shouldn't be President. And I mean really believe it.

Which is why I don't see how he could have continued voting for Reagan. And if he believes in the value of trade uniones, how could he have voted for Reagan after he broke the air traffic controllers union. Or a whole lot of things Reagan did. He really has to explain.

With this speech, a few more like it, and an explanation, I could be completely convinced. To support him 110% if he got the nomination, not to switch now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You might check out this site.
Featured on this week's "NOW with Bill Moyers".

http://www.factcheck.org/article.aspx?docID=97

It summarizes his explanations pretty well. Clark may have bought Reagan's argument that the air traffic controllers strike was a threat to national security. I'm just speculating.

Maybe if Clark had been home then, he would have realized how bad Reagan was for the country. If we'd have run Kerry instead of Dukakis, maybe Wes would have voted differently.

I applaud your open-mindedness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaisyUCSB Donating Member (455 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. can you link to a Reed or From article espousing a future w/o unions
Thank you in advance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC