8. Do you have some rational evidence not to support susa?
Many polls nowadays are robo-polls. Unless you have done an extensive statistical study, I don't think you can easily prove that they're indeed less accurate than standard telephone polls. Susa has a lot of data in their site purportedly proving that they actually do better than most other polls.
use random digit dialing, but their is a human interviewer. The robo interviewer could be more easily manipulated by non-voters such as children. Its not a technique that is well respected in the industry. I have a deep level of mistrust.
I think the numbers if NJ make sense. The VA numbers are consistent with what we've seen elsewhere. NV seems closer than many polls we've seen.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.