|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:12 PM Original message |
This thing is not over for Edwards yet (my #2 candidate) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalVoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. The problem for him is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:26 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Did Clinton win CA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. don't really understand that argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Clinton was at single digits one month before NH. At that time, nobody |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:40 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. point taken but he wasn't running against a guy like Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 05:55 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Yes he was. Jerry Brown. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bombtrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 06:29 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I don't think Brown was EVER the frontrunner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Far left liberals (like me) were taken in by him, and the media helped... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jadesfire (114 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
34. not an open primary in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tameszu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
30. Clinton had AFSCME other unions and was the money leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sophree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #9 |
33. Bombtrack- what happened? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyJay (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 07:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. The problem with that is, CLARK is this race's Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 07:20 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Almost two years ago, Clinton was asked who he liked in 04. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyJay (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 07:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I like them both don't get me wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Best war time presidents ever: Lincoln and FDR. One was a laywer, and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dookus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I agree entirely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. They were reelected during wars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Grant being a general helped him be elected because of the frontier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Interesting. But, as you suggest, I doubt many Americans thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xray s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Edwards would make a great VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leilani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think Edwards has run a very honorable campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigMcLargehuge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
12. he has a good organization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
19. If Edwards wins IA, it most definately will generate headlines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helleborient (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Edwards does have strong face-to-face appeal (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathleen04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
21. I agree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mlawson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. Over for him?? He is in good shape, IMO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
26. My main worries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. you worry too much ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. heheh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 09:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Amen to that ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DjTj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 09:22 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. ...as far as Edwards future... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
27. Absolutely! It's not over for him by any means... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark4VotingRights (795 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:08 PM Response to Original message |
28. Oh, it's definitely not *over* for Edwards. He's a rising star. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aunt Eunice (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
31. South Carolina.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sophree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
32. Go Edwards! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. Deleted message |
cosmicdot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 10:07 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. "but he is too young" ... he's 50 years old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 10:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Bill Clinton was 46 when he became president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-15-04 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
41. Your right. Edwards is in this thing for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angee_is_mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-16-04 12:20 AM Response to Original message |
42. that's why Clark need him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC