Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some interesting stats point to a decisive Kerry win!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:24 PM
Original message
Some interesting stats point to a decisive Kerry win!
I was looking at an article in USA Today and it has some interesting stats.

In 1980 Carter lead Reagan by three points going into the debates. After all the debates were over Reagan had taken a two point lead then went on to win by TEN POINTS!!!! Sound familiar???


2004 - Bush lead kerry by 8 points going into the debates. After the debates Kerry now leads Bush by 1 point according to USA Today. If the trend we saw from Reagan Carter hold true then Kerry will win a lot bigger than we think. Tim Russert said that these kinds of elections are usually not very close and he expects undecideds to start falling heavily one direction or the other. A commentator on PBS said that incumbents historically have been very hard to beat however in the past 45 years that trend has changed because of televised debates. Since then Carter was not re-elected, Ford was not re-elected and Bush 1 was not re-elected. Voters seem to now have a flavor for trying something new if what they have seems only average or below average. Kerry has absolutely all the momentum right now. I expect Kerry to win Nationally by at least three points. Also Zogby reported that 49% of voters want someone new. Kerry simply had to show he was more competent than Bush to win and he has done that. All we have to worry about now is an October surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
craiga86 Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. They didn't have electronic voting then though
You never know. I think if all votes are counted, Kerry wins by a landslide, but over course that never happens, and basically it will depend on how many of these votes aren't counted. Your already seeing voter fraud around the country now with a few blatant cases, last year we WON, but the end result wasn't quite what we wanted. Lets hope this election is a bit more fair than the last one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If exit polling contradicts results their will be hell to pay!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They'll Just Bury the Exit Polls Again
Like they did in 2000 and 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. there's not much of October left
If * wants to spring an October surprise, he'd better hurry up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROH Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Which calendar do you use?
There is still over half of October left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. One more (anecdotal)
No president with a one-syllable name has won a second term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Ulysses Grant
Served two terms: 1869-1877
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. There are two big problems with your comparison
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 07:06 PM by dolstein
First of all, Carter's approval ratings were much, much lower than Bush's are today. So Carter's standing was much weaker with regard to the electorate as a whole than Bush's standing is today.

Second, Carter faced a badly divided party. He was challeneged by Kennedy in the primaries, and many disaffected liberals ended up voting for John Anderson. The Republican Party is still overwhelmingly united. Bush faced no primary competition, and will likely get the votes of at least 90% of Republicans, comparable to what he got in 2000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You are right and that is why I didn't pick Kerry to win by 10 points
I picked him to win by three or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC