Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One of the worst lies of last night from Bush. No litmus test for judges.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:40 PM
Original message
One of the worst lies of last night from Bush. No litmus test for judges.
That is utter nonsense. Of course there is. Every man or woman Bush has nominated to federal judgeships have been vetted by the Federalist Society.

Every one of Bush's nominees are ardently pro-life, anti-affirmative action (particularly in the case of Charles Pickering), pro-business, anti-consumer. These nominees are much in line with the far right wing out of the mainstream philosophy that guides this administration.

We Americans will have to live with the legacy of these judges decisions. Their rulings will affect the law for...and our lives...for years...for decades to come.

Kerry is bringing this up in this campaign. And I'm heartened that he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
soupkitchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who was he trying to fool with that one?
Do you think there was anyone in America who believed him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. He said that after last week mentioning Dred Scott
which was another way of saying he won't appoint judges that "invent" law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. But that is exactly what his judges do... invent law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alevensalor Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. What I don't get
is what's so bad about a litmus test for Supreme Court jsutices? It's the highest judicial office in the land, the people who fill that role SHOULD be vetted.

Of course, Bush knows that the American people would not approve of the way he vets them, so he says he does not. Pure, unadulterated bullshit. I am more uncomfortable with a president who says "Nope, don't care what they think, just appoint 'em"

~A!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. A tiger doesn't change its stripes. Pickering, Gonzalez, etc. is just *
warming up. They were the MODERATES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. and Kerry looked great in comparison
telling the truth about his position, while Bush waffled.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. My question: Who taught George the phrase "litmus test"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It was an old 90's talking point
Somebody forgot to update his notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Didn't Bush Sr. use the same phrase in his campaign?
When I heard Bush Jr. say "no litmus test for judges" I thought "Gawd, am I hearing his dad now?"

I wondered if the "Iraqi Soldiers ripping Kuwaiti babies from incubators" lie would soon follow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. fifty bucks says it WASN"T chem class
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's not litmus...its the 'culture of life' test...nothing personal there
Dread Scott anyone??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. he said no judges
who would take out "under god" from the pledge. Isn't that a litmus test?

Did I dream that he said that in the 2nd debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. ayup
He may not take personality "responsibility"
for leaving his fingerprints on the litmus
test....but we all know his handlers will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC