|
- gay marriage --> Kerry's answer should be that he is where most Americans are on gay rights: he sees marriage as twixt man and woman, he thinks gay couples should get civil unions, he thinks no one should be fired for being gay, he thinks that hate crimes legislation is a good thing. I think Kerry would be best to take it upon himself to expand any gay marriage question into a general question on gay rights. He could even use the line, "I'm where most of America and Dick Cheney are on these issues." With this sort of response, I don't see how Bush could score any points on him with this issue. He could also try to draw Bush out on the broader issue of gay rights, as a trap where Bush could upset some of his fundie base. Imagine Religious Reich rage if Kerry would be able to get Bush to agree with him on signing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act? That could be worth 1 or 2% sitting at home on Election Day.
- stem cell research --> I thought that Kerry was not properly prepared for the Friday debate question, given how a new British study came out showing how congenital heart defects in mice fetuses were repaired with injection of embryonic stem cells into the mother carrying them. He could have turned this into hope for millions of Americans threatened by heart disease. I hope he's more prepared for this topic on Wednesday.
- deficit reduction --> Kerry and Bush will both be asked, "So.. how are you going to pay for all of this?" Kerry should use this opportunity to briefly bash the hell outta Bush (suggested quote: "And you call yourself a fiscal conservative?! Ha!"). He should then offer limited detail on his plan, complete with large, round dollar amounts. Example: "By reversing the tax cut on the top 2%, we can use this money to reduce the national deficit by X trillion dollars." Example: "Your family's shart of the national debt right now is Y thousand dollars." Example: "The interest on this national debt means that your children will end-up paying Z% more in taxes when they find jobs."
- environment --> this is where Kerry should attack, attack, attack. He should play a clear, concise game of "follow the dollars." It should follow this pattern: "Contributor X gave the GOP M thousand dollars. The GOP then made Decision A, which cost taxpayers T dollars and put P tons of this chemical into your water supply." Kerry could easily stir-up some public outrage against Bush on this topic. I really, really, really hope that it comes-up.
|