LOL - Freepers new strategy to counter online Kerry votes tonight

[unfrigginreal]

Remember that their brilliant strategy for the Edwards/Cheney debate was supposedly that they would all vote for Edwards. That was going to sink us for sure, lol.

Here's tonights new strategy from freepshit mrplind:

To: lowbridge

I have a new strategy. Consider this: What if we didn't touch one poll tonight. What if every online poll out there was like 90 percent Kerry and 10 percent Bush ... I bet the online news outlets would start getting pissed at the Dems and their stupid tactics. I think it would be better than trying to out FReep 'em!

6 posted on 10/08/2004 2:18:07 PM PDT by mrplind (The greatest threat to the United States is not "terrorism" as we know it, it's liberalism!)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

-------
If you want to check out the link it is Skinners post in it's entirety.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1239388/posts

[MsTryska]

1. You know....they might be onto something.....

i wonder when the press is gonna figure us out and the jig will be up. ;-)



was there last plan really to vote for edwards?

[tomfodw]

2. Unilateral disarmament! I love it!

If they want to concede, I have no problem with that. It would work even better if they decided to try this "tactic" on Nov. 2.

[rob-ok-vin]

6. maybe we should suggest it

they might buy it

[MsTryska]

3. self-delete

double -posted

[sam sarrha]

4. we are not freeping, we are exersizing our right to vote.. screw the mind

control bullshit

[NYC Liberal]

5. As long as we don't vote multiple times...

What's the problem?

[tomfodw]

13. In their universe, they rule and we roll over

Now that we're fighting back, that is entirely out of their belief system in how the universe is supposed to work and they just can't handle it. They're entering a fugue state (and I don't mean by Bach).

Good for them, the pathetic little Hitlerjugend wannabes.

[Roland99]

15. Exactly...do you want to win fairly or win at all costs?

[Mortos]

16. I hope they adopt the same defeatist tactic on Nov. 2

[Digit]

36. We don't need to...we outnumber them.

I did not vote twice on any of those polls. It is discouraged, anyway. Freepers do, tho.

[bowens43]

7. This is so funny!!

These freeping idiots complaining because we are, in their twisted little minds, 'freeping' polls??????

Don't they see the irony?

[drscm]

8. Rush would be verty disturbed if they did that because

according to Rush, its not enough to win. You must destroy the enemy.

[tomfodw]

19. I guess his brain cells are his enemy

Since he's certainly doing all he can to destroy them.

[highpitch]

9. lolinternet /nt/

[russian33]

10. Why stop there? They should not vote on November 2nd for W..

..that'll show us!

[high density]

11. Sounds good to me

Though I did like the Tuesday night strategy of the Freepers voting for Edwards a little bit more than this one.

[blm]

12. Hey freepers, try something HONEST for a change. If you really think Bush

won after the debate, then vote for him with ONE vote, just like any HONEST person would.

[Nightjock]

14. Unbelievable they call Dems "robots"

The way bush and company control the media (and bush supporters) is a classic example of how Nazi Germany happened.

I used to wonder as a kid how it was possible and to a lesser degree I have been living it for 3 and a half years!!!!!

[southern democrat]

17. Sound to like they are preparing for an ass kicking

[southern democrat]

18. Theirs

[Paradise]

20. since they're planning on using our "list", perhaps

skinner can just arrange it so that they can't get at it, like he does with the "search" feature.
just a thought!

[w13rd0]

21. They should try that same tactic on November 2nd!

That's a great idea! They should stay home. When Kerry wins in a landslide, everyone will scoff at the obvious "Dem poll rigging" via overwhelmingly superior turnout...

[EarlG]

22. Whoops... freepers inciting each other to break the law

As we all know, there's nothing illegal about encouraging people to vote in online polls - if the media are stupid enough to report the results, that's their own fault. But this:

+++

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1239388/posts

+++

...is an attempt to organize a denial of service attack, which is illegal.

Oh dear.

[unfrigginreal]

24. Oh my, Oh my! Sic 'em Earl G.

It's about time rimlips donated to DU.

[Boredtodeath]

28. Why not block the IP address?

If you block the IP address of the FR server, the links there won't work.

It should be a simple .htaccess file on the server.

[nothingshocksmeanymore]

33. Call the FBI!!!

not really..

[geniph]

37. Dear me.

I thought the CONservatives were supposed to be law-and-order types? Shame, shame.

[bigtime]

23. eewww, eewww, eeeewwww!

unclean! I just clicked on that link without looking! freerepublic on my nice clean computer! blah!

[tomfodw]

25. We'll have to perform an exorcism.

What an ugly, stupid-looking site, too. Blech.

[sofa king]

26. Those online polls cannot be all our own doing.

The Free Republic is a much larger website with much more traffic and an equally motivated audience. They posted our own poll lists on their own site within minutes of our doing so.

They more than cancel our vote.

Except for one thing: a lot of them think that if they lie, they're going to hell.

Their silence last week and Tuesday night is deafening.

[Mountainman]

30. if they lie, they're going to hell

If true then all freepers are going to hell! I don't believe hell so I guess it's not true.

I'd rather party with the sinners then pray with the saints.

[colonel odis]

27. they'll never vote for kerry in a poll, online or real world.

so let's freeper them back and all say bush kicks ass.

OR stay away from the polls completely.

[Vincardog]

29. OK Freeper let's try it. Give Kerry 100% and dare FOX to report it.

:think: :think: :think: :think: :think:

[noamnety]

31. The media wouldn't expose it if their polls were rigged

1. The polls drive a ton of traffic to their sites
2. Web hits = ad renevue for them
3. Because of that, there's no way they would want to discredit their polls even though they know they are unscientific.

[wildeyed]

32. hilarious

They can't admit that we annihilated them in the last two post debate spin wars, so now they are going to pretend that, um, they weren't really trying. Yeah, they didn't try, that's why they lost. Heh.

[4_Legs_Good]

34. CNN did take that poll down like 5 times...

didn't they.

Whatever kids! You go about things your ways, we'll go about them ours.

Does DU *really* (or FreeRepublic for that matter) have that much of an influence on the big polls. I can understand Freeping or DUing having an effect on small 1000 respondant polls, but on 1/2 million on CNN.com or CBS, etc.?

david

[LynnTheDem]

35. Just save a mirror of their post

Won't they look incredibly STUPID (as always) then. :)

And speaking of STUPID...why would anyone get pissed at the "Dems and their stupid antics" if the ONLY VOTERS were Dems??? Anyone with any actual BRAIN -that leaves out all rightwingnuts- would realize it meant only Dems bothered to vote.