Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2,986 people died on 9/11. 2,330 is the number of U.S. Soldiers dead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 04:30 PM
Original message
2,986 people died on 9/11. 2,330 is the number of U.S. Soldiers dead
Edited on Sun Apr-02-06 04:33 PM by file83
in the "War on Terror".

Look at those numbers: 2986 and 2330

Who here thinks that before the U.S. Soldier death toll surpasses the 9/11 death toll, there will be another major terrorist attack on U.S. soil?

I think so. Politically, it will be hard to justify losing MORE Americans in the "War on Terror" than from "Terror" itself.

So, me thinks that before war casualties surpass 9/11 casualties, there will be another major attack on U.S. soil to raise the "death from terror" number.

DISCLAIMER: This is obviously just casual speculation on a prediction, geared towards the MIHOP school of thought. My speculation will sound totally preposterous to those that don't believe in MIHOP or LIHOP. So, if you don't beleive in LIHOP or MIHOP, please spare me the lecture because that is outside the scope of this post. Thanks, file83.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-02-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually, 2616 is the number of US military deaths.
2332 in Iraq and 284 in Afghanistan.

http://icasualties.org/oif
http://www.icasualties.org/oef

- Make7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sure, include that number too....so what do you think....
...another MIHOP before the total dead from the war surpasses the total dead from 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Make7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Two cents.
Well, I'm not really a MIHOPer in the first place, but strategically speaking I'd say a major attack being successfully "thwarted" before the 2006 elections is much more likely - just a little reminder for the citizens.

I think 9/11 is justification enough for most Americans as far as the "War On Terror" is concerned. Although it does appear that more and more people are coming to realize that the Iraq War is not actually part of the "War On Terror" - that is but one of the many reasons for its current lack of support. The Republican party may have spent more political capital on Iraq than they can ever hope to regain.

The biggest problem with an attack occurring while Bush is in office, and the Congress is still controlled by Republicans, is that it would prove that their sales pitch of being the only ones able to protect America from terrorism is nothing more than hot air. An attack could possibly help them on a very short term basis, but I believe it would be a huge liability in 2008.

I can already hear Cheney saying, ""It's absolutely essential that in the mid-term elections we make the right choice, because if we make the wrong choice then the danger is that we'll get hit again." Now if the Democrats were to regain control of both houses of Congress......

- Make7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I hope you are right. You might be too, because afterall this is about
politics. That would be the 2nd major terrorist attack on US soil on Bush's watch - that would be a 'pattern' - a death blow to the Repug's claims of promising a 'safer' America.

Thanks for chiming in, Make7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry to nitpick...
but I thought the number of dead on 9/11 was 2,973. Of course, I did get that number from the 9/11 Omission Report, for what its worth.

Are you also including deaths from anthrax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-03-06 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Whatever numbers you want, but the question remains....
Edited on Mon Apr-03-06 11:29 PM by file83
Do you think there will be another MIHOP before the total dead US soldiers surpasses the total dead from 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not if they don't have to.
I was pretty sure MIHOP 2 was going to occur in October 2004. I posted quite a few times my belief that if the race for President was close, they would just rely on Diebold to give them the victory, if Kerry was ahead by more than 5%, MIHOP 2 would occur. We all know what really happened.

I don't think MIHOP 2 is dependent on whether the total dead US soldiers surpasses the total dead from 9/11. I think it's more dependent on Iran, whether * can drum up enough support i.e. fear to get the populace and Congress behind his warmongering desires there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. No opinion but I LOVE that disclaimer!!#$$!!
A disclaimer a day will keep the trolls away!

DISCLAIMER: This is obviously just casual speculation on a prediction, geared towards the MIHOP school of thought. My speculation will sound totally preposterous to those that don't believe in MIHOP or LIHOP. So, if you don't beleive in LIHOP or MIHOP, please spare me the lecture because that is outside the scope of this post. Thanks, file83.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-04-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You like that? You can use it! Seems to have worked.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-05-06 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Screw the numbers...

This admin is most likely fake an Iranian terrorist attack against us before '08.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC