|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 12:43 PM Original message |
no concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertypirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. WOW do you believe everything you see on TV? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Funny, seems to contradict this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 02:05 AM Response to Reply #2 |
21. Yes, HOW They Fell, but UK Concrete Core Wrong. No Elevators & Stairs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killtown (575 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
3. Notice how one of CDI's previous implosion's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
4. Did they say explicitly that the WTC had no concrete core?...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 07:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 09:31 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Yamasaki had used concrete cores in his buildings..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. Most media says that there is not a concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. in this show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jschurchin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 07:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The only way we...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libertypirate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Which is an amazing point.... Since no other buildings in the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. According to Peter Lance, a known associate of the Blind Shiekh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 07:53 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Government entities generally hold blueprints for a set period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 07:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Intellectual property. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jschurchin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-30-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Agreed, there is no reason.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 02:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
32. Maybe this video can be helpful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 08:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. There was a helluva lot of concrete dust after 1 collapsed nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-29-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. the floors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 07:45 PM Response to Reply #11 |
47. Too Much Gravel In The Basement, No Rock In Light Weight Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 06:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. You missed the part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 02:02 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Bush-Linked Company Handled Security for the WTC, Dulles and United |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. That's not what I'm talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 11:40 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. That theory is ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Well, that is the theory certain posters have wedded themselves to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adolfo (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. With or without a concrete core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. You get no argument from me about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. If There Was A Steel Core There Would Be Images Of It. There Are None |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. People have posted a lot of those exact images |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #45 |
54. You Have No Evidence to Support Your Position-You Cannot Dismiss Forensic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 06:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. The Worst Part For ryan Is That The Concrete Core Explains Free Fall |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 07:58 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. Gee, maybe I should whine to the mods for a personal attack from you like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
55. Fact Is, You Have No Explanations That Are Logical-Free fall Must Be Expla |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 09:18 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Free fall easily explained. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 11:21 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. You Have Not Explained Free Fall-Plane Crashes Do Not Release Energy In |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #58 |
70. Physics not your strong suite eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #70 |
77. Physics Requires Logic-You Missed Your Chance To Apply It-Distortions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #77 |
78. Add reading comprehension to the things you're not good at like physics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 12:51 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Forensic Evidence Shows Concrete Core-Check Your Basic Comprehension Skill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. Not Gullible Are You? "Talked Openly About The Steel Core." That Won't Do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
17. It doesn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 04:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. end of story? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 05:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. CNN themselves believed there was a concrete core on 9/12/01 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #19 |
74. Hey, I can play the link game too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #74 |
80. It's Not A Game-Your Link Says Nothing-Has No Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 08:44 AM Response to Reply #74 |
114. Can you up with a link that pre-dates 9/11 that says that.Did not think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 12:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
40. sorry, but you and many many others are in denial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:35 PM Response to Reply #40 |
51. You don't get to decide what are "facts" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. They Were Blown Up-but NOT End Of Story ..... Bombs Cannot Do What We saw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-31-06 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. Sorry For You-Being Lied To. I Saw A Detailed Documentary On The Towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 07:53 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. amazing isnt it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Subject Concrete Core, Not Video-No Steel Core Columns Are Ever Seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 06:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. How many times have numerous people asked you to produce this documentary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 08:24 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. Image Of Concrete Core-Those Wishing The Truth To Go Away, Always Ask |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-01-06 10:19 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. The video, where is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 01:11 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Video Gone. All That Is Left Is Information That Fits The Photo Evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. So, the men in black in conjunction with the saucer people disapeared... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 12:37 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. They don't erase evidence.They ignore it ...which is a more powerful tool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 12:40 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Show me the evidence, I won't ignore it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. This Is All The Evidence A Knowledgable, Honest & Courageous Person Needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 02:43 AM Response to Reply #38 |
60. Concrete cores were WTC architect Yamasaki's speciality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:13 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. Please explain to me how you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #61 |
63. It has the word CONCRETE in the same sentence as the word CORE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:28 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. I understand that technical topics can be difficult to understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 08:41 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. The very issue that you have raised... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 09:06 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Is that fuckin' so?!...keep going! your reactions to Yamasaki's statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:24 AM Response to Reply #67 |
94. Yeah, that IS fucking so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 08:30 AM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Fuckin' try this 1992 RE-INFORCED concrete core for size. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:24 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. Since the objection was to the other quote you posted.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:11 PM Response to Reply #97 |
100. I will let Yamsaki do the talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:26 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. How does that show the Bank of Oklahoma building has a concrete core? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 05:43 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. The IBM building has a concrete core! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 06:14 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. Have I said somewhere that it did not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 06:18 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Boy .....you are sounding desperate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 06:28 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. You said it had a reinforced concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 07:10 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. You could not be more wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 07:38 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. What am I wrong about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 04:39 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Everything......deal with it....The WTC had a re-inforced concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 02:37 PM Response to Reply #113 |
117. Everything? That is certainly disappointing news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 02:54 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Sorry to dissapoint you!.......but this guy knows what he is talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #118 |
120. Considering your track record so far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 02:41 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Shall I increase your pain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-07-06 05:37 AM Response to Reply #118 |
124. This is a perfect example of what I am talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-07-06 01:03 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Do not take my word for it!.....Find/get the book! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Are you serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Dead seriouse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 12:48 PM Response to Reply #127 |
129. Clearly, you do not understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 03:41 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. In fact that you know that I do understand.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #130 |
131. I don't think you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 01:45 PM Response to Reply #131 |
132. O' Hagan says That the WTC conforms to his hypothetical model. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #132 |
133. "I said Good Day!" - Fez ( n/t ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #133 |
134. Which is proof that you cannot break the link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 02:47 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. "I said Good Day." ( n/t ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-18-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. Oh yeah......don't forget the carpenter who worked in the WTC...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. You Are Right! Steel Structure Wouldn't Have Laminar Dust Flow Down Side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 09:09 AM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Your illusion is livin' on borrowed time pal....enjoy it whilst it lasts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #68 |
86. What illusion - that the english language can survive the 'net? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:19 AM Response to Reply #86 |
92. Your "steel core" bullshit is yesterday's news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 08:56 AM Response to Reply #61 |
66. Wow!....you do sound fuckin' desperate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #66 |
73. Do you believe that they put C4 in the WTC as it was built? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 03:42 PM Response to Reply #73 |
82. I believe that the WTC had a re-inforced concrete core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 06:06 PM Response to Reply #82 |
104. Nice way to ignore the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 06:12 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. Who is ignoring what question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:29 AM Response to Reply #105 |
122. The C4 coated rebar question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 12:07 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. I took that image from another forum web page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 06:35 PM Response to Reply #73 |
85. Using Fear Of The Possible To Obscure Certainty-What Intent Can It Be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #85 |
103. Why? I'll tell you why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 08:08 PM Original message |
Read My Page, You've Got It Wrong-How Do Built In Explosives Make Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
112. RE: Free Fall and Total Pulverization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #103 |
111. Read My Page, You've Got It Wrong-How Do Built In Explosives Make Concrete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 11:36 AM Response to Reply #66 |
76. Who sounds desperate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 03:49 PM Response to Reply #76 |
83. I mentioned that OKC building had a reinforced concrete core! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #83 |
89. Yes, if the "fact" isn't actually true there is "harm" done. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:18 AM Response to Reply #89 |
91. IBM building in Seattle and Bank of Oklahoma have re-i-concrete cores. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #66 |
87. Hmmm... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:22 AM Response to Reply #87 |
93. You know it all too well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #60 |
72. Hmm, is the Bank of Oklahoma 110 stories tall? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 03:36 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. The wind load is absorbed by the shock absorbing dampening system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 01:05 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Ridicule Misplaced: Video Not Subject, Concrete Core Is. Here Is Core Base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 03:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. BZZZZZT, wrong! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:01 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Video My Education, Images The Proof W/Logical Explanation-No Steel Core |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:32 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. We'll see who's afraid, certainly not DUers!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Get Real. Interior Box Columns Too Large For Elevator Guide Rails |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-02-06 09:09 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. You're kidding right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 12:17 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Coiled Rebar Silouetted Over Concrete Core, Pipe Would Be Flattened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 10:34 AM Response to Reply #59 |
71. Wrong again, once again, wrong again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 06:16 PM Response to Reply #71 |
84. Not Reading-No Comprehension-No Integrity-It Appears This Is Your Job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 10:13 AM Response to Reply #56 |
69. i posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:16 AM Response to Reply #50 |
62. DU poll results: 79% of votes were for the WTC having a steel core. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ryan_cats (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #62 |
75. Help me here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #75 |
88. Poll Not Taking Freefall & Pulverization Into Account-Not Scary To Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgsmith (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-03-06 08:58 PM Response to Reply #88 |
90. Here we go again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rawfooddan (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
96. proving the pancake theory false |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-04-06 04:32 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. What are the actual collapse times that you are using? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rawfooddan (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 09:03 AM Response to Reply #98 |
115. actual collapse times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Make7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 03:10 PM Response to Reply #115 |
119. There is quite a bit of debate about the collapse times around here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Christophera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-05-06 11:27 AM Response to Reply #96 |
116. Good Method Of Structuring Basic Calc's-Actual Times Beside The Point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Show_Me _The_Truth (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-16-06 11:40 AM Response to Reply #116 |
128. Why not maximum carnage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-19-06 05:39 AM Response to Reply #128 |
137. explanation has been offered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC