Identifying Misinformation

[Bushwick Bill]

I thought I'd throw this out to the wolves...as most here know, the oilempire site is extremely critical of the focus on the Pentagon issue.

Identifying Misinformation:
State Department’s Rosetta Stone for understanding 9/11 disinformation,
promotes 9/11 conspiracy hoaxes, ignores “Crossing the Rubicon” and other quality investigations

<snip>

This writer is aware of a few Democratic politicians and party officials who privately agree that there was official complicity in 9/11 -- one admitted to this author that he knew Cheney was running war games on 9/11, but an hour later, when in front of a microphone, refused to touch the subject when asked. Fear is the currency of empire.

<snip>

The official story of 9/11 is dependent on bogus evidence to support a conspiracy theory -- the claim that 19 guys directed by a wealthy dialysis patient in a cave in Afghanistan managed to outwit the largest military and intelligence system in history, a system so incompetent that it needs a massive budget increase to protect the public from a repeat of the attack.

But a more subtle, different set of bogus evidence is also in wide circulation, making wild claims about official complicity based based on poor quality images, fraudulent photos, and misrepresentation of facts. This material masquerades as investigative journalism, but is largely devoid of verifiable evidence (some of it does include real facts to establish the bona fides of the disseminator to make the hoaxes more palatable to the reader). The volume of this disinformation became increasingly prominent as the 9/11 Truth Movement experienced political successes in persuading larger numbers of people that 9/11 was not a surprise attack.

White House advisor Karl Rove is famous for his skills with dirty tricks to sabotage political campaigns. Perhaps the most widely recognized Rove success was the allegedly fake memos given to CBS (see BS?) News in September, 2004 that documented how George W. Bush went AWOL from the Air National Guard. Those memos were immediately proclaimed to be fake after CBS used them, and in the ensuing brouhaha, the AWOL story was completely discredited even though the facts were correct. It would have been much harder for Rove to steal the 2004 election if the reality of the AWOL scandal had been taken seriously by the media, and using this faked, but true evidence was a successful gamble to immunize his candidate from these explosive facts.
http://www.oilempire.us/state.html

[Woody Box]

1. What does this guy want?

As far as I remember, Ruppert says in "Crossing the Rubicon" that he believes that no plane hit the Pentagon. So what?

Ruppert also gives Thierry Meyssan credits for being the first to realise the Pentagon oddities. So what?

I know two sites who devote entire sections to disqualify so-called "disinformation sites". One is oilempire.us, the other one 911research.wtc7.net. A clear case of paranoia, I presume.

[Monkey see Monkey Do]

2. You forgot Fintan Dunne and his

"everyone but me is CIA" thesis.

[rman]

3. I think the point of the writer is that “Crossing the Rubicon” is ok

That's the impression i get from reading the first part of the article.