Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Molten steel found at base of WTC!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:12 PM
Original message
Molten steel found at base of WTC!!!
Edited on Tue Nov-15-05 05:14 PM by happydreams
This is some strange stuff.

"Two unexplained "spikes" in the seismic record from September 11 indicate huge bursts of energy shook the ground beneath the World Trade Center's twin towers — just as the buildings began to collapse.


American Free Press has learned of pools of "molten steel" found at the base of the collapsed twin towers weeks after the collapse. Although the energy source for these incredibly hot areas has yet to be explained, New York seismometers recorded huge bursts of energy, which caused unexplained seismic "spikes" at the beginning of each collapse. These spikes suggest that massive underground explosions may have literally knocked the towers off their foundations causing them to collapse.

"MOLTEN STEEL"

In the basements of the collapsed towers, where the 47 central support columns connected with the bedrock, hot spots of "literally molten steel" were discovered more than a month after the collapse. Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed.

Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, told AFP that he saw pools of "literally molten steel" at the World Trade Center. Tully was contracted on September 11 to remove the debris from the site.

Tully called Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland, for consultation about removing the debris. CDI calls itself "the innovator and global leader in the controlled demolition and implosion of structures."

Loizeaux, who cleaned up the bombed Federal Building in Oklahoma City, arrived on the WTC site two days later and wrote the clean-up plan for the entire operation.



http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn2.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here goes...
:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another one of *'s babies nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you really want to quote the AFP?
They are a banned site for good reasons.

As for the molten steel and seismic reading I suggest a stroll through the archives - this is only the fourth or fifth time this year this particular revelation has been posted. It has been pretty well hashed out many times over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not necessary to quote AFP, lots of credible sources- but at least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The fires burned in the rubble for months..
think of the thousands of tons of combustible material a modern skyscraper contains. No mystery here - a good analogy is a landfill fire where fires burn underground for months.

Much is made of this molten steel but no one can make a logical argument as to why it proves controlled demolition. High explosives do not melt steel - they shatter steel using high pressure, high impulse shock waves. Some make an argument that thermite was used but there are two problems here: the first is that it is not used for controlled demolition nor does it provide an advantage over high explosives for bringing down steel buildings - so why complicate things by adding a second type of explosive to the conspiracy. Secondly, even if you used thermite, it would severe the steel by making a narrow cut - it would not produce large "pools" of melted steel. It is ludicrous to think that the plotters felt the need to use enough thermite to melt entire massive steel columns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lithos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Locking
Serendipity.li is considered a bigoted and unreliable site and thus not appropriate for DU.

Lithos
Sept 11 Forum moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC