Spitzer's reps say it's interesting but they lack jurisdiction. It's not inconceivable they take it seriously, but imagine the huge risk it would involve to pursue it.
Before blaming them, it must be admitted that since the initial filing there has been little action on the part of the filers. The Complaint steering committee has lost some focus and needs to get back on track in delivering pressure and street actions.
If there were 50,000 people on the street, Spitzer would have to notice. And might feel there's actual air cover for a grand jury or investigation.
But it need not be Spitzer who plays the role of "Garrison." Any prosecutor with (figurative) balls can choose to play this role.
The most important thing anyone outside NY could do is to file complaints in other states and jurisdictions.
Given the scope of this crime, many states can potentially claim partial jurisdiction or convene a grand jury to investigate 9/11. A local D.A. could do it (localities and states do not lose jurisdiction to the feds in murder cases).
That's where you could come in and help save the day, whoever you are. Anyone can take whatever pieces of the present complaint they like best, substitute their own states' citizen interests in 9/11 for New York, and submit a complaint to their own state AG.
Check out this appendix:
STATE JURISDICTIONAL MATTERS RELATING TO 9/11
http://justicefor911.org/Appendix8_StateInterestsin911_111904.phpAlso, many of the items listed as damages to New York can be applied to other states:
http://justicefor911.org/Appendix1_DamagesTaxonomy_1111904.php
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
