Tuesday Hear a Live Interview with Kevin Ryan

[seemslikeadream]

http://www.noliesradio.org/



Great music presently

[Bolo Boffin]

1. From the tragically insane to outright liars today.

We are so blessed here in the September 11th forum.

[seemslikeadream]

2. Kevin Ryan said

Kevin Ryan said that a new paper by Dr. Steven Jones on thermite chips found in the Word Trade Center dust is about to be published by a mainstream science journal, within the next two weeks.





archieved here

http://www.noliesradio.com/#AS

[Bolo Boffin]

3. I'll alert the media. n/t

[rollingrock]

4. And OCTers wonder why more people don't come forward?

Duh...


Area man stirs debate on WTC collapse
South Bend firm's lab director fired after questioning federal probe

By John Dobberstein
Tribune Staff Writer
November 22, 2004

SOUTH BEND -- The laboratory director from a South Bend firm has been fired for attempting to cast doubt on the federal investigation into what caused the World Trade Center's twin towers to collapse on Sept. 11, 2001. Kevin R. Ryan was terminated Tuesday from his job at Environmental Health Laboratories Inc., a subsidiary of Underwriters Laboratories Inc.,the consumer-product safety testing giant. On Nov. 11, Ryan wrote a letter to the National Institute of Standards and Technology -- the agency probing the collapse -- challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers.

... Ryan wrote that the institute's preliminary reports suggest the WTC's supports were probably exposed to fires no hotter than 500 degrees -- only half the 1,100-degree temperature needed to forge steel, Ryan said. That's also much cooler, he wrote, than the 3,000 degrees needed to melt bare steel with no fire-proofing. "This story just does not add up," Ryan wrote in his e-mail to Frank Gayle, deputy chief of the institute's metallurgy division, who is playing a prominent role in the agency investigation. "If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I'm sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers..."

link

[AZCat]

5. Kevin Ryan is an idiot.

He was wrong then, and he continues to be wrong now.

[rollingrock]

7. Anyone that dares to challenge the official story is an 'idiot'

Nothing to see here, move along.

[AZCat]

8. Nice strawman.

Be careful, though - readers might think you're incapable of addressing my actual point, rather than one you made up all by yourself.

[LARED]

6. Good Lord, another attempt to resurrect Ryan

You really do love lost causes.

[defendandprotect]

9. If Ryan needs "resurrection," it is only because like JFK witnesses . . . .

the real witnesses to 9/11 are ignored ---

over and over again!!!

[greyl]

10. He doesn't need resurrection. He needs to be ignored.

However, assuming your premise wasn't faulty, your reasoning is terrible. You're defending giving exposure to frauds instead of to honest-to-goodness witnesses to 9/11? Are you sure it isn't because you don't actually have any honest-to-goodness witnesses to your theoretical inside job?

[William Seger]

11. Kevin Ryan was a "real witness to 9/11"?

That changes everything! I thought Kevin Ryan was a water tester who made a fool of himself and embarrassed his employer by writing a dumb letter pretending to know something about fire testing and steel while simultaneous proving that he doesn't, signing it as if he was speaking as a representative of UL? Or is there another Kevin Ryan?

[defendandprotect]

12. k i c k