And I won't encourage you to post all your financial information on the board! ;) Gerald Celente is just one person, and the ability to get himself on TV and whatever isn't a strong recommendation. Go ahead, listen to all of us, then see what you think.
Here's a sharper critique of Celente than the one posted by Bolo:
http://www.edrants.com/gerald-celente-futurist-fraud Me, this is the first I've heard of him (or this critic!). His scenario still sounds pretty unlikely -- and even if you're trying to hedge against it, putting money in a safe doesn't seem like a big help, if the money is presently federally guaranteed. It's logically possible that the feds could renege on those guarantees without the currency being devalued, but it's not high on my list of things to worry about. Anything else you can do to increase your self-sufficiency would seem to be more useful. In event of food riots (or electric grid collapse or whatever), food might do you more good than cash or gold. I think probably most of us should do more emergency preparation than we have -- but I'm absolutely not talking about full frontal survivalism.
You indicate that you've lost lots of money in your 401(k), so I assume that a lot of that has been in stocks. There is standard advice about (a range of) how much of your one's investments to have in stocks at various points in life. At this point, you
may want to aim low, on the principle that the risk of stocks crashing (from where they already have fallen to) outweighs the upside possibility of stocks surging. That assessment partly would depend on your time horizon, which is why the standard advice is to dial down on stocks as one gets older.
For what it's worth, I'm on the board of a small foundation, and the foundation is longer on cash and equivalents than it has ever been -- but it still owns lots of stock. Its time horizon is quasi-infinite.