George W Bush Authorized 911 Attacks Says Government Insider

[seemslikeadream]

http://www.daily.pk/world/americas/99-americas/3789-george-w-bush-authorized-911-attacks-says-government-insider.html

George W Bush Authorized 911 Attacks Says Government Insider


SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.



SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on television the first plane attack the first tower." And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for violating Americans' rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for being a corrupt entity. And I've been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of government we are dealing with.

[Bolo Boffin]

1. So now Alex Jones is getting into the Pakistan Daily so it's OK to link to him?

Sheesh, Louise.

[Ghost in the Machine]

2. It isn't *about* Alex Jones, it's about Stanley Hilton... please stick to the subject..

Your personal dislike of Alex Jones doesn't mean anything here...

It's the content.. stick to the content of the story...

[wildbilln864]

3. So what says SH today? nt

[rj5690]

4. Oh please

[PufPuf23]

5. IMO Hilton's lawsuit was bogus but I am not sure of

the motivation.

http://www.oilempire.us/hilton.html

Stanley Hilton's phony 9/11 lawsuit

the one named plaintiff sued Bush, et al., because he was fired from his job at Neiman-Marcus for distributing peace literature

the attorney was a friend of Senator Bob Dole (Republican)

It's not much of a legal case if the sole named plaintiff is suing Bush, et al, because he was fired from his job at a department store for passing out anti-Bush literature. If Mr. Hilton wants to pretend that Mike Ruppert is behind his other "plaintiff" objecting to being included on his lawsuit without his permission, he should reflect on the fact that he couldn't even spell Mr. Munson's name accurately.

A REAL legal effort about 9/11 is at justicefor911.org -- but is unlikely to ever see the inside of a courtroom.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/01/911-in-courts-sort-of-almost_19.html

I see that Stanley Hilton's $7 billion federal class action lawsuit against the Bush Administration for its complicity in the attacks has been thrown out. While I've been, and remain, skeptical of Hilton and his motives, it's interesting to note the ruling was based on the "Doctrine of Sovereign Immunity". "In other words, the suit was not dismissed because of lack of evidence, but rather because the judge reasoned that U.S. Citizens do not have the right to hold a sitting President accountable for anything, even if the charges include premeditated mass murder and premeditated acts of high treason."