Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect (New Paper by Judy Wood/John Hutchison)

[CB_Brooklyn]

Anomalies at the WTC and the Hutchison Effect

by

Judy Wood and John Hutchison

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/


Excerpt:

=======================
In considering how the WTC complex was destroyed, many people have criticised the research posted here because it does not state or describe the exact technology employed.

These pages include data which strongly implicates a class of technology as being one of the main ones used.

The data below seem to strongly tie up with features of what has become known as “The Hutchison Effect”. The Hutchison Effect actually seems to describe a range of observed characteristics, some of which are listed below. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been experimenting with “field effects” for almost 30 years. There is a great deal of information about him on the internet, and a selection is linked from this set of pages.

The table below lists effects and events seen at or in the vicinity of World Trade Center and compares those with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect. Clearly, the posting of this material is quite controversial, but even in the various documentaries that have featured John Hutchison, he has suggested that the techniques he has discovered and developed have been further refined by places like Lockheed Skunkworks, S.A.I.C. (Science Applications International Corp.), and also by perhaps other defense companies.
=======================


My comments: Although still under construction, the new paper gives many clues to the technology that was used to destroy the World Trade Center. Take a look at the many pictures and see for yourself! People can no longer claim that this technology does not exist. It definitely DOES exist!

Also note the two companies mentioned in the excerpt above (Lockheed Martin and SAIC). Both are sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society! The government even contracted with SAIC for the NIST Report.

See the "News" section of Dr Wood's website for upcoming interviews with Andrew Johnson where he will discuss the new paper. Also in the "news" section is a downloadable MP3 of an interview with John Hutchison.
http://drjudywood.com/#news


For proof that the 9/11 attacks, the 9/11 cover up, and the 9/11 "truth movement" were all orchestrated by people associated with directed energy weapons and the media, see my new article:

9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=151&Itemid=60


Also note the two Court Cases in the US District Court, Southern New York, with attorney Jerry Leaphart:

Dr Judy Wood, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that Directed Energy Weapons were a causal factor in the destruction of the World Trade Center.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr Morgan Reynolds, suing on behalf of the United States of America and demanding a Trial by Jury, has evidence that the Media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane hitting the South Tower.
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case


Bottom line... there were NO hijackings on 9/11 and the entire War On Terror is BOGUS!

Even Peter Jennings knew the 9/11 airplane video was fake. Note his nervousness and word fumbling when ABC plays the clip back in slow motion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCDu2V3yjS4

As retired Aerospace Engineer Joseph Kieth says: "The video is phony because airliners don’t meld into steel and concrete buildings, they crash against them!"
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=no_planer_resigns


What about the eyewitnesses who say they saw planes hit the towers, you ask? See the following analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews, which were published in the New York Times. You'll learn that only a very small percentage of the First Responders reported seeing airplanes hit the towers. Even fewer reported hearing them. But... they had no trouble hearing the fighter jets later on! Whatever they saw "hit" the towers was a projection:

Going in Search of Planes in NYC
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=134&Itemid=60


What about the airplane wreckage, you ask? Well, first of all, there are NO verified airplane parts. (The government refuses to release any.) And second, when an airplane crashes into a building, the engines are not going to wind up underneath scaffolding:


See here for more:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=trouble_with_jones#NBB


What about the cell phone calls, you ask? Faked using advanced voice synthesizer technology as reported in the Washington Post two and a half years before 9/11:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm



There were NO hijackings on 9/11.

There were NO plane crashes on 9/11.

The entire War On Terror is BOGUS.

[LARED]

1. Thank Goodness for Judy Wood

We now have the word Jellification to add to the 9/11 lexicon.

http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ4.html#jellification

She might want to look up the word plastic deformation.

[Sweet Pea]

3. I Second that post!

I've missed her...."take" on things! She certainly never lets us down!

[achtung_circus]

2. Well, that sets my mind at ease, it all becomes clear, now.

Obviously an unimpeachable source.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hutchison_Effect

In 1979, Hutchison claims to have discovered a number of unusual phenomena, while trying to duplicate experiments done by Nikola Tesla. He refers to several of these phenomena jointly under the name "the Hutchison effect", including:

1. levitation of heavy objects.
2. fusion of dissimilar materials such as metal and wood, while lacking any displacement.
3. the anomalous heating of metals without burning adjacent material.
4. the spontaneous fracturing of metals.
5. changes in the crystalline structure and physical properties of metals.
6. disappearance of metal samples.

Hutchison has maintained a number of websites over the years, in which he posts videos and pictures of the purported effect, including short low-quality clips of objects flying around or rising from the ground, and metallic objects moving without being touched.<1><2> He has offered mail-order VHS tapes of the effect for $100 each,<3> though videos are now sold exclusively through Gryphon Productions.<4>

[OnTheOtherHand]

4. sweet

All the other giddy elements aside ($100 videos?!), I like the way that disparate events are described as an "effect."

I lost my keys the other day, and my car is starting to rust. I call it the OTOH Effect, but the people in power just pretend it doesn't exist! (I don't sell videos, because I'm afraid the authorities would use them to track me.)

[wildbilln864]

5. Sorry CB but that Hutchison is ...

a fruitcake IMHO! link
:hi:
And Jim Marrs is another one I wouldn't want representing the truth movement IMO. Alien Agenda!?

[CB_Brooklyn]

6. Interview Link

Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson on WPFC - We Ourselves 14th Jan 2007

Dr Wood and Andrew Johnson discuss how it looks as if the WTC was destroyed by some type of techonology related to the Hutchison Effect


MP3:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/audio/911/We%20Ourselves%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood%20and%20Andrew%20Johnson%2014%20Jan%202007.mp3


VIDEO:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7438627977642539647

[jberryhill]

7. It's very sad what Dr. Wood considers to be a "paper" these days.

I've asked this before, but does anyone know the specific circumstances of her coma and its duration?

[rhymeandreason]

8. ABC Video

Sometimes I think the no plane theory is preposterous but that video really does look like a fake.

[SDuderstadt]

9. Except you have numerous witnesses on the ground who saw and heard the planes

How do you explain that?

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/whattheysaw%3Aeyewitnessaccountsofthenycai

[Sweet Pea]

10. With all due respect....

I'd submit you don't know what an aircraft looks like, then.

[Sweet Pea]

11. Does anyone have an email for Reynolds?

I can't find one anywhere on his site.