Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Per Fainter. From a new DU member.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 05:28 PM
Original message
Per Fainter. From a new DU member.
LINK

My computer skills are very limited, but I believe the above is the address to a message which appeared this morning 10:08 Fri. March 09 2007 on the messageboard of nineeleven.co.uk. The poster's message contains a live link to a YouTube video which apparently is a recording of British TV news coverage of the unfolding events of 9/11. The broadcaster's logo appears in the upper lefthand corner of the screen, the numeral 5 inside a circle (BBC5?). The camera is trained on the second tower, the first tower has already collapsed. Apart from a witness interview regarding one of the plane strikes, the camera's eye never wavers from the second tower (the news anchors are never on screen, we only hear them talking). On edit I must add that this video on YouTube is comprised of at least two distinct snippets of what I believe to be a single broadcast.

The newpersons' discussion mentions the previous collapse of the first tower. They then state that they are receiving live updates from some kind of official WTC website. The WTC website informs them that debris is falling off the perimeter walls (the camera dutifully focuses in on debris falling off the building) and that because the perimeter walls are so integral to the structural soundness of the tower, the building is in danger of collapsing. In fact, the newspeople state that it is in the "process of collapsing". Shortly after this discussion, the building does in fact collapse. They go on to report, in a similarly blase tone, a carbomb going off outside the State Department, and another bomb going off inside a Washington (presumably D.C.) mall. One or both additional reports are variously attributed to the Associated Press and a senior government official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Foreknowledge of WTC-2's collapse
Then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani told ABC News that he received a warning that World Trade Center was "gonna' collapse" a short time before it did.

I .. I went down to the scene and we set up a headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna' to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.

-- ABC News: http://stj911.org/evidence/docs/abc_giuliani.wmv

In an interview published in 2005, EMT Richard Zarillo describes delivering a message from the OEM (Office of Emergency Management) to Fire Marshal Steven Mosiello and Department Chief Peter Ganci:

As I was walking towards the Fire command post, I found Steve Mosiello. I said, Steve, where's the boss? I have to give him a message. He said, well, what's the message? I said the buildings are going to collapse; we need to evac everybody out. With a very confused look he said who told you that? I said I was just with John at OEM. OEM says the buildings are going to collapse; we need to get out.

He escorted me over to Chief Ganci. He said, hey, Pete, we got a message that the buildings are going to collapse. His reply was who the f___ told you that? Then Steve brought me in and with Chief Ganci, Commissioner Feehan, Steve, I believe Chief Turi was initially there, I said, listen, I was just at OEM. The message I was given was that the buildings are going to collapse; we need to get our people out. At that moment, this thunderous, rolling roar came down and that's when the building came down, the first tower came down.


-- Interview, New York Times: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110161.PDF

Fire Marshal Steven Mosiello describes receiving the warning from Zarillo:

A. At that point I don't know exactly when the Commissioner and Mayor had left. It was pretty soon after they had left that Richie Zarillo, who works with EMS -- I believe he's an OEM liaison -- came running up to me. I was not on the ramp at this time. I was like almost at the sidewalk location.

He said Steve, where's the Chief? I have to tell him, you know -- I said tell him what, Richie? These buildings are in imminent danger of collapse. I said how do you know that, you know? So he ran with me. I ran over and grabbed Chief Ganci and said Chief, these buildings are in imminent danger of collapse. He looked up at me.


-- Interview, New York Times: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/9110141.PDF

http://www.skyscrapersafety.org/html/article_20040520.html

In the epic accounts of Sept. 11 provided over the last two days by former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani and his aides, the Police and Fire Departments bravely worked together, and no catastrophic failure to communicate doomed scores of firefighters inside the World Trade Center. Instead, Mr. Giuliani testified, those firefighters heard an evacuation order, but still did not leave the building. They were "standing their ground" to make sure civilians got out, he said.

Mr. Giuliani's vision of the day, offered during his testimony before the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks, addressed the loss of many firefighters who appeared to have had ample opportunity to escape. Along with his former commissioners of the police, fire and emergency management departments, Mr. Giuliani denied that the city's response suffered from the central problems identified by the panel and by earlier city investigations. The firefighters "were interpreting an evacuation order the way a brave rescue worker would interpret an evacuation order, which is to first get the civilians out and then get yourself out," Mr. Giuliani said.

For all the power of his voice and stature, however, Mr. Giuliani's account must compete with a substantial and diverse body of evidence that flatly contradicts much of what he and his aides say happened that day, particularly on matters that could be seen as reflecting on the performance of his administration. On perhaps the most painful of these, the loss of at least 121 firefighters in the north tower, Mr. Giuliani suggested that they stayed inside the trade center because they were busy rescuing civilians -- never mentioning that they could not hear warnings from police helicopters, that many of them never learned the south tower had collapsed or that they were having serious problems staying in touch with their own commanders.

Witnesses who escaped from the tower tell a vastly different story than Mr. Giuliani. They say that in the north tower's final 15 minutes, only a handful of civilian office workers were still in the bottom 44 floors of the building, perhaps no more than two or three dozen. Many of the firefighters who remained in the towers were between the 19th and 37th floors, having made slow progress up the stairs in their heavy gear. It is clear, witnesses said, that even after the south tower collapsed, many, if not most, of the firefighters had no idea that they were in dire peril, or that it was time for them to leave. In contrast, police officers received strong guidance from their commanders to get out of the building, the commission reported, thanks in large part to the information sent to the ground by police helicopters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. "witnesses said ... the firefighters had no idea that they were in dire peril."
Probably because their asswipe chiefs are lying about the evacuation orders they supposedly issued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably Channel 5, a commercial British channel.
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 08:21 PM by CJCRANE
ON edit: there is no BBC5 TV channel.

On edit2: Channel 5 logos http://www.answers.com/topic/five-tv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fainter Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. "According To The Website Of WTC..." on 9/11. What Website?
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 11:45 PM by Fainter
"...now what we can see are that sections of the other tower are also crumbling...now the reason this is happening ACCORDING TO THE WEBSITE OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER...they're telling us that the structure...the outside cladding of this building is integral to the safety and security of it...once you penetrate it apparently the very structure of the building is under threat and that's why one tower has already collapsed."

"You can see now live pictures of the billowing smoke from the collapsing second tower...it is completely enveloped in smoke...it is on fire and we understand this other, this other tower is also in a situation of near collapse."

"We are told the collapses are continuing, that the damage that was made by the two planes hitting the twin towers...first one of the twin towers we understand has collapsed entirely...we understand the second twin tower there are also collapses there...we are looking at the live picture of the twin towers in New York..."

All this, albeit however shortly, before the actual collapse of the tower. Has anyone ever heard about this website before? Where was it being updated from that morning? It couldn't have been the towers? I am hopeful someone can parse this better than me, but as the male announcer (Charlie) is parroting Blair's words from a speech (it is the duty of democracies to defeat these fanatics), a breakaway shot of falling debris from what appears to be the first tower is shown in the second inset screen as the female announcer interjects "Ah...here we are...you can see..." but then defers to the male announcer who natters on a bit before the picture cuts away for a witness interview concerning the plane attacks. It is at this point that the transcripted reporting above regarding the "crumbling" second tower commences. Now what is slightly odd about this sequence is that the female announcer has apparently been waiting on the production staff to put this bit on the air, she's been expecting it. Then after the witness interview the female announcer states that "...what we can see is that sections of the other tower are also crumbling...", but what seems to be a distant live shot of the scene on the screen reveals no such thing. If we are seeing what she is seeing, where does she get this? And in any event, the video evidence she adduces for "crumbling" "cladding", I think, is most certainly from the first wave of debris streaking groundward during the collapse of the first tower, not incidental pieces falling off the damaged facade of the other structure. These mysterious updates from the WTC website introduce the meme of the crumbling cladding in connection with perimeter damage and total building failure. Instead of letting the live shot tell the story, somebody on the news staff took the decision to air misleading footage in support of this new meme concerning a collapse mechanism. I am deeply suspicious of any attempts to gild the narrative lily on such a day. Is this mistaken or dishonest reporting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Crumbling cladding would have about as much effect as breaking the windows.
What a pantload that prefab psyop story was/is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Plus, as I read somewhere...
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 01:59 AM by Contrite
"Aluminum melts at less than half the temperature of steel and if the fires were so bloody hot, why didn’t some of the aluminum façade on the WTC towers melt?" (Morgan Reynolds)

Also, as Hoffman notes: "Energetic ejections of dust occurred well below the rapidly descending demolition wave in each tower. Squibs which you can see in animations show rapid ejections of high velocity gases, over 200 feet a second. The aluminum cladding was blown 500 feet in all directions, littering surrounding buildings for considerable distances.

It wasn't as if the towers exploded in a single explosion. They exploded in what's called a smooth wave. They started exploding and the explosion continued; it sounded like a huge ocean wave roar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Aren't there reports of molten metal?
And what about that stream of molten metal seen pouring out of one of the towers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fainter Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. WTC website also source for media wtc7 collapse 4knowl? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seatnineb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nice find....and here is what is left of the WTC web site:


Sorry, but the file you wanted was not found.
Either the link was mistyped, or you've tried to visit a page which no longer exists or has been moved.

http://www.panynj.gov/wtc/wtcmain.HTM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You might try this link.
It looks like the site was reorganized.

Downtown Restoration Program - THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY&NJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC