9/11 Live or Fabricated: the NORAD Tapes.

[reprehensor]

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=2006091418303369

9/11 Live or Fabricated: Do the NORAD Tapes Verify The 9/11 Commission Report?

David Ray Griffin
September 4, 2006

Part I of II
Conclusion of article at: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=2006091418303369

A significant stir was created by the publication in Vanity Fair of “9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes” by Michael Bronner, the first journalist to be given access to these audiotapes--which NORAD had provided, upon demand, to the 9/11 Commission in 2004. The public impact of Bronner’s essay was increased greatly by the availability of snippets from these tapes (which could be accessed from the online version of the article) to be played on TV and radio news reports about the article.1

The stir was caused primarily by Bronner’s report of the charge by members of the 9/11 Commission--which had played excepts from these tapes during hearings in 2004--that the military had made false statements to the Commission, perhaps knowingly. This stir was increased by the publication at the same time--the first week of August 2006--of Without Precedent, a book by Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton--the chairman and vice chairman of the Commission, respectively--in which this charge is also made.2

The charge primarily involves the military’s pre-2004 claims about the responses of NEADS--the Northeast Air Defense Sector of NORAD (the North American Aerospace Defense Command)--to two flights: AA (American Airlines) 77 and UA (United Airlines) 93. (There is also, although Bronner does not deal with it, a serious discrepancy with regard to UA 175.) These claims are contradicted by the tapes, with “tapes” here meaning not only the NORAD tapes, to which Bronner refers in his essay’s subtitle, but also what he calls “the parallel recordings from the F.A.A.,”3 which he used in conjunction with the NORAD tapes. (Excerpts of these FAA tapes had also been played at the Commission’s June 2004 hearings.)

Coninued at link...

[Nozebro]

1. Griffin is a limited hangout promoter. He never talks about the faked

videos that were used to fool the public into believing they saw large airliners crash into the WTC.

[FoxOnTheRun]

2. You prefer Morgan Reynolds?

[DemInDistress]

3. what was faked? flight 11 and 175? I don't think so, 2 commercial

jets did crash into the WTC..was it flight 11 and 175? I can't say for sure but I rest my case for 2 commercial size jets crashing into the towers.
I am MIHOP all the way more so after listening to the explosions caught on tape by rick siegel "Eyewitness to 911"
I also believe explosives brought down the towers and there is evidence of that at terrorize.dk.com.

Since NIST is with holding 7,000 photo's hundreds of hours of videotapes and countless documents one can't help but believe our government has a hand here.


Let's follow the money. Who gained the most? H'm, larry silverstein, D.o.D. Carlyle, Halliburton, GOP in congress and many more.

Have you seen IN PLANE SITE? I heard the thunderous roar of a commercial jet and the crash aftermath debris
raining down to the street, yes that was real.

[Nozebro]

4. What is it?

"I rest my case for 2 commercial size jets crashing into the towers."