Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just watched 9/11: Toxic Legacy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
pointblank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:08 PM
Original message
I just watched 9/11: Toxic Legacy
on The Discovery Times Channel.

Those who worked at ground zero after 9/11 have been screwed.

Do our supposed "leaders" have ANY conscience?

If they can discount those who were there in one of our greatest times of need, how do you think they feel about the rest of "us?"

Do you think they care?

The official 9/11 is a lie...we are nothing but livestock.

Banish me to the dungeon..I don't care. The word needs to be spread.

On edit: If you haven't seen the documentary...you should. It is on again Saturday 9/9 at 4 pm. Set your TiVO and be prepared to be pissed.

Also, I re-posted this from GD because NO one there seemed to give a shit. Thank You.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it about the EPA and how they manipulated the asbestos sensors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointblank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is about the complete disreagrd
for the cleanup workers immediately following 9/11 and how sick (and dead) most of them have become.

They were told THE AIR WAS SAFE!

Now, I admit anyone with any sense would have worn a mask down there, but a paper mask was not enough. These people are sick and being ignored.

Its a fucking outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmm..
I wonder where Giulianni had his mask so quick



White House edited EPA's 9/11 reports

By JOHN HEILPRIN
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON -- At the White House's direction, the Environmental Protection Agency gave New Yorkers misleading assurances that there was no health risk from the debris-laden air after the World Trade Center collapse, according to an internal inquiry.

President Bush's senior environmental adviser yesterday defended the White House involvement, saying it was justified by national security.

The White House "convinced EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones" by having the National Security Council control EPA communications after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, according to a report issued late Thursday by EPA Inspector General Nikki Tinsley.

"When EPA made a Sept. 18 announcement that the air was 'safe' to breathe, the agency did not have sufficient data and analyses to make the statement," the report says, adding that the EPA had yet to adequately monitor air quality for contaminants such as PCBs, soot and dioxin.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/136350_epa23.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Anderson Cooper did something on this last night
(He did a pretty good job, mostly about how the government is stalling, saying it will take "long term" studies to decide if there were health hazards. They had a doctor on who said it takes more than 5 years for cancer to develop after being exposed to a carcinogin (sp) and that most the police/fire/and construction workers who are sick now were probably exposed to other toxic substances years ago. Cooper did point out that that doesn't explain why Red Cross and other volunteer workers are also getting sick. And he did show one of the cops saying that he doesn't have 20 years to find out what caused his illness.

No mention was made of the rescue dogs who worked the site - I know I heard once that several had died of cancers. As dogs metabolize things faster than we do, it would make sense to track down every animal that worked the site. After all, they use animals for medical testing all the time, why wouldn't the health of these animals make a valid study?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC