WMD AT THE WTC - New Video Premiere in DC on 9/11 - Watch Trailer!

[spooked]

WOW - Listen to that HUGE BOMB explode in the background!! What do you think THAT is!?


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3211807290597119388&q=wtc

[Bolo Boffin]

1. You don't seriously think a "thermonuclear device" was used?

Do you?

[LARED]

2. It's sad to think how many people will believe

this nonsense.

[carlvs]

3. Surprised???

Considering how many of the people here are glued to the rantings of a quack scientist that recently interpreted the discovery of a combustion product of one of the most widely used plastics as a sign of "Thermite," I wouldn't expect anything less...

[Carefulplease]

4. Of course that is a "nuclear winter" following a thermonuclear blast...

How else would you explain all that snow?

This must have resulted from an H-bomb detonating in the core. How else would you explain that there were *just* a handful of uninjured survivors in the stairwell at the epicenter of the blast?

They really nailed it this time.

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[mirandapriestly]

6. I'm glad you have the footage of the explosion

while those guys are on the telephone. Someone put that up here a few days ago, but it was on a site we're not supposed to link to, so now I know where it came from. I take it this is Rick Siegal, I wonder where he got it. Wowee...

[spooked]

7. Oh Jeesh...I'm not saying there's anything to the WMD claim

Hope you enjoyed that opportunity for sarcasm.

[AZCat]

8. Then what ARE you saying?

You start a thread with the phrase "WMD at the WTC" in it and don't provide any real commentary - what are we supposed to think? :shrug:

[spooked]

9. I think the chemical analysis is interesting, not to mention

the theory that Depleted Uranium may have been used at the Pentagon, if it was hit by a missile not a plane. I wouldn't put anything past this government.

"Around the Pentagon there were reports of high radiation levels after 9-11. American Free Press has documentation that radiation levels in Alexandria and Leesburg, Va., were much higher than usual on 9-11 and persisted for at least one week afterward."

http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/depleted_uranium.html

But the most interesting thing in the video is the sound of that big blast. It's hard to tell, though, if it is coming after one or both towers have fallen.


The title "WMD at the WTC" makes me think how ironic it is that no WMDs have been found in Iraq, yet we have released the radiation equivalent to 400,000 Nagasaki bombs on these poor people in our recent Gulf wars.

"Dr. Katsuma Yagasaki, a Japanese physicist at the University of the Ryukyus in Okinawa, has estimated that the atomicity equivalent of at least 400,000 Nagasaki bombs has been released into the global atmosphere since 1991, from the use of depleted uranium munitions."

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/03/05/the_queen_s_death_star_depleted_uranium


Does it seem so strange, then, to consider, even for a sceptical moment, that "WMD" could have been used at the WTC?

There is no doubt that what we have at the WTC on 9/11 is MASS DESTRUCTION. What we don't know is what "WEAPON" was used to accomplish this feat (besides 2 planes, that is!)

[FoxOnTheRun]

10. yes its called asbestos and mercury

and killed dogs and affected people.

[TheWraith]

15. Several things wrong with what you just said.

For starters, about the Pentagon foolishness. Besides the ridiculousness of the whole missile-not-plane theory, I feel compelled to point out that contrary to what "American Free Press" says, depleted uranium is not used in missiles. Ever. Period. It's used in armor-piercing bullets and shells.

Second, the "400,000 Nagasaki bombs" figure is completely wrong and misleading. It overestimates the amount of depleted uranium used by a factor of ten, and it compares low-energy, nonpersistant, nonpenetrative alpha particles to high-energy gamma radiation.

Third, the issue of "elevated radiation" related to 9/11 is one I've heard thrown around a lot, but there's never more than hearsay evidence for it. A lot of fast and loose facts, talking about what people claim to have measured, or what someone supposedly said about it, but few hard figures or verifiable facts.

[cherokeeprogressive]

20. I gotta agree

Depleted uranium is also used in leading edge surfaces of some military aircraft as a counter-weight to provide balance in high-g maneuvers.

I've seen 500 lb bombs (what the navy calls mk 82's) 1000 lb bombs (mk 83's) and 2000 lb bombs (mk 84's) go off with my own eyes, from less than 3000 feet away. I was standing on top of a brick building in the middle of the Nevada desert, outside of a city called Fallon (just a little background info).

High explosives DO NOT make big orange fireballs surrounded by thick black smoke. JP does. That's the thing that always makes me laugh about the folks who claim that a "missile", or a "missile disguised as a plane" hit the Pentagon. They've seen too many Hollywood movie-type explosions.

I'd bet that ANYONE with knowledge of high explosives would back me up on this.

da chimperor still gotta go though... Never get me wrong on that.

[Brainster]

11. First Guess is a Transformer

Considering that WTC7 was constructed atop an electrical substation.

[DoYouEverWonder]

12. You would think they would have

shut down the substation early in the day when they evacuated the building and decided not to even try to put out the fires?

[TheWraith]

16. Transformers are filled with oil and chemicals.

They're perfectly capable of exploding without the intervention of electrical current.

[DoYouEverWonder]

17. There is nothing in the NIST or FEMA reports

that indicts that the transformers exploded or were involved in the demise of the building.

Their investigations are pointing to the pressurize fuel system that ran around the 5th Floor feeding the generators.

The government is still trying to figure out how the damage from the collapse of WTC 1 could have reached all the way into the 5th Floor and severed these pipes in just the right spots. My guess, is that human intervention was involved. With the faulty design of the system, it was easy to turn a few of these pipes into blow torches at the base of the 3 main trusses holding up the building.

[TheWraith]

19. Nobody said the transformers blew up the building. NT

[FoxOnTheRun]

13. Isn't it funny that

Tripod II BIO-warfare emergency exercise drill was planned for Sep.12 in NY

[truthmover]

14. Spooked, No offense meant.

Spooked,

My bad joke got deleted. I assume that someone, maybe you, took offence, which was not my intent. I meant to be making fun of the movie, and not you. That would be easy to misinterpret. I think that audio evidence of explosions is very interesting. I also think that 'WMD at the WTC' looks like the next 'In Plane Site'. Sorry if I rubbed you, or someone else, the wrong way. It was a bad joke, but for some reason I haven't laughed so hard in a while, and thought I'd share my moment of humor. I guess it didn't translate. Hey, I'm a friendly, happy dude, and wouldn't be personally attacking people who care about the truth. I didn't mean to get things started on the wrong foot.

[spooked]

18. no offense taken, thanks ;-)

It's hard to know the truth anymore, though, isn't it?

This will probably end up like the Kennedy Assissination...40 years from now, we still won't know what really happened on 9/11.

[DemInDistress]

21. Hey spooked..good find.. now add this to that

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/wtc7dem1/911.wtc.7.comming.down.soon.wmv

are these guys demolition experts? or con-ed workers?
how did they know WT7 was coming down soon? what was
that explosion?

[mp3hound]

22. Does it involve rabbit cages?

Just asking.

I'd hate to click on the link only to find innocent little rabbits being put out of their homes by some quack psuedo-scientist.