:kick:
Greetings DU 9-11 investigators.
First, the question of this piece of debris is important because
if the debris piece photographed over a hundred feed north of the crash is a piece that could only have come from the starboard side of a Boeing 757 in American Airlines livery
and if the aircraft that actually entered came at the west wall from the southwest so that its starboard side faced south or southeast
and since the wind, by the subsequent smoke movements, was from the northwest
and since the piece could not have gone through the fast compacting fuselage of a Boeing 757 (had a Boing 757 actually been crashing there that day)
we must conclude that the piece was planted where it was found by some means other than the crashing exploding killer jet.
Remember, the piece is light and not aerodynamically shaped for flight -- it would be like throwing an opened newspaper page across the room, even if it was thrown in the right direction.
And so the cover-up must discredit the finding that the fragment could only have come from the letter "n" on the starboard side.
I haven't read all of the articles in this thread, but the first few show clearly that the rivets are not being taken into account, the scaling to size is wrong (look at the thickness of the overlayed lettering fragment compared to the comparison photos in each case.
Now look at the alignment of rivets in the the critical blank space of bare aluminum following the fragment letter and you will see at once that this fragment could only have come from the "n" on the starboard side.
Go here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/9-11-demonstrative-evidence-of-frameup/message/70===================
Clearly the piece was planted for Faram and the other photographers to find and capture -- a disinfo op supporting the frame-up story from the front page of Time -- and notice that this piece is like a polar bear in the Amazon insofar as it is so different from the smithereens and shards lying in the same vacinity -- those smithereens being nothing other than the exploded missile casing from the warhead that produced the white flash into which the Boeing (overflying the crash) disappeared into as it headed for Reagan National one mile beyond.
-----------
And yes, the "planting of the piece is consistent with everthing else that is known, including:
1. Pentagon security camera shows
a. Too short a plane
b. Smoke trail of a missile being fired
c. White-hot flash explosion consistent with a missile warhead
2. Photos show wrong crash imprint in the wall
3. Photos show and wrong flash-powder burn darkening the wall
4. Downed lampposts and witnesses each identified a different
approach path to the Pentagon, the Boeing's and the killer jet's
5. Wrong kind of debris
6. Single piece of right kind of debris shown to have been
found on the opposite side of the approach path from
the side of the plane where that particular piece had
to have come from.
7. Witnesses also
a. heard a missile
b. heard a sonic boom prior to blast
c. smelled burning chordite after the blast
d. saw a radar blip behaving like a jet-fighter blip
8. No photos of wreckage from inside consistent with the crash
9. Evidence of only one engine and one seat , a pilots seat.
10. A distraction plane, ur engine plane making dives over D.C.
both photographed, videotaped and shown on BBC, and
reported (erroneously) by many wintesses as the actual plane
"diving at an irrecoverable angle)
11. The attack was made almost horizontally into the first-floor
level -- consistent with a countour-hugging jet-fighter attack
12. Normal rescuers were prevented from entering the building
while only certain people, including Rumsfeld himself, conducted
(screened) victims from the building
13. Rumsfeld had recently been given exclusive power to
OK air interceptions -- and yet he was in his office the whole
time the twin towers were hit, and when the Pentagon was
hit he went to oversee "rescue" instead of going to the situation
room where his interception authority could be given -- he
arrived at the situation room at about the time the Pennsylvania
plane (backup for the Pentagon) was finally shot down.
14. The various drills and practices for an air attack on the Pentagon
including some kind of simulation on 9-11-01 itself, coupled with
denials that such an attack had been considered possible.
15. Impossible stories by, for example,Republican John Judge
(regarding his amazing stewardess friend who claims to
have seen the Boeing inside the hole, recognized the
plane as the one she always flew, recongized her
stewardess friend as a victim by a photo of her
severed arm with the matching "friendship bracelett"
they both wore; that she was passing out doughnuts
and coffee to the rescue workers with the salvation
army when the salvation army was nowhere in evidence at the
scene -- John Judge who is a professional JFK conspiracy
theory debunker and discloses that this same stewardess
friend is also a JFK theory investigator, the same
John Judge who launched the phony "People's Investigation
of 9-11 with a press conference by stating that the Pentagon
attack is not something responsible investigators should bother
investigating etc. since we "know" the Boeing hit the Pentagon
and don't want to be a laughing stock etc. -- the People's
investigation that never once reviewed any of the evidence
packages I posted to them -- the same John Judge who to this
day refuses to debate Dick Eastman on any internet forum and
whom all -- dare I use the term -- "responsible" 9-11
investigators think is a John Judge who is working for
the coverup, for obstruction of justice, and because he
does it so badly is himself become one of the proofs of
the frameup along with the known-only-to-himself flight
attendant who works one of the flights that most definitely
had to have been regularly monitored by US intelligence
operatives, probably flight attendents, and this one just
happened not to take Flight 77 that day by happenstance etc.
-- so how about it, Mr. Judge? (I should add that John Judge,
is the man who undertook himself to be the intermediary between
the families of survivors and the 9-11 investigating community,
John not wanting families bothered by "irresponsible"
investigators, whom he defines as those who do not accept
the official story of the Boeing crashing at the Pentagon.
A really sweet guy, that John Judge, right?
taken me up on offer for debate -- maybe some of you at
DU could encourage him, especially those of you who take
accept the cover-up story as gospel.]
16. The deaths of only the CIA's indepdendent intelligence
revivals , the Offices of Naval Intelligence personel, and
auditors of defense spending contracts etc. alone moved
into the "newly renovated" section that was hit -- on the side
where most of the witnesses would be the Arlington Cemetery
dead or people involved with driving their cars. Naval
Intelligence would have independently investigated 9-11
had they lived -- the investigator that no official has
yet conducted -- Wolfowitz sure bin Laden had done it
and ready with the solution of invading Afganistan on
the very first day -- even as they were allegedly taken
by complete suprise only a few hours before that determination.
See the evidence photos and witness testimony confirming all of the above and further analysis in support of these conclusions by respected men of science here:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TRUTHBAZOOKA/message/5
and here
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/Eastman/m18h05.html
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
Every man is responsible to every other man.