Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Still in denial about 9/11 Truth? Time to put up or shut up

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-12-06 08:11 PM
Original message
Still in denial about 9/11 Truth? Time to put up or shut up

The National 9/11 Debate seeks people willing to defend government account of 9/11 in a public debate forum

“As of August 1, 2006, the 9/11 Commissioners, NIST scientists, and other key personnel responsible for the government’s non-sustainable account of what happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 all refuse to participate in the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC. Consequently, the National 9/11 Debate date has been moved forward to March 10, 2007.

While the 9/11 Commissioners and NIST scientists remain invited to participate in the National 9/11 Debate, the Muckraker Report has expanded the potential government debate team members to any qualified persons that are willing to publicly defend the government’s account of 9/11 against the civilian debate team already assembled.

“The elapsed collapse time of WTC 1, 2, and 7 debunks the government’s pancake theory of collapse. Coupled with the fact that chemical traces of substances normally associated with controlled demolition have been found on debris from ground zero, and the fact that the government never developed a working “controlled demolition hypothesis” when investigating how WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed even though the collapse of each clearly looked like controlled demolitions, is sufficient cause to hold a public National 9/11 Debate. Basically, all one needs is a stopwatch to understand that the government has yet to provide a sustainable theory as to how the twin towers and building seven collapsed,” explains Ed Haas, National 9/11 Debate Coordinator. “A $2 stopwatch provides hard evidence that the government has failed to adequately explain what happened in NYC on 9/11. Why those desperate to believe the government’s account of 9/11 continue to ignore this basic fact must be answered.”

If you’re an outspoken critic of people that disagree with the “official government theory” of 9/11, here’s a golden opportunity for you to attempt to silence the critics. If you think you have the right stuff, contact Ed Haas today.”

Press Release – August 4, 2006
Contact: Ed Haas

Office: (843) 278-5021
Mobile: (843) 327-7598
efhaas@comcast.net
www.teamliberty.net

http://valis.gnn.tv/blogs/17430/Still_in_denial_about_9_11_Truth_Time_to_put_up_or_shut_up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chall Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Any takers out there?
This sounds like a great forum to defend the government's 9/11 theory once and for all and totally ridicule the "tin hatters" who keep getting in everyones' faces causing great cognitive dissonance.

Some of the OCT defenders, who spend a lot of time at this limited venue, may welcome the opportunity to reach a larger audience?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I have seen a number of posters calling the work of Dr. Jones
"junk science." A number have also called him along with other members of the 9/11 Scholars for Truth some not nice names. This would seem to offer the perfect opportunity to talk about "sulfidation" or whether a steel frame building would act as a heat sink during a fire.

But all I hear now that this incredible opportunity has presented itself is a whole lot of peace and quiet. So what's up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grateful for Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3.  I have noticed that weekends are very calm
Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. A few days ago, someone said it was postponed till March.
If there's more than one, and this one is current, and they pay my airfare, I'm down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It has been said that one should put their money where there mouth is,
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 11:45 AM by John Q. Citizen
not somone elses money! What you propose (yeah I know it's a joke, just not that funny)is sort of the equivalent of playing poker and expecting the other players to cover your stake so they can see if you in fact have any cards, but good try.

I stake my kids on the rare occasion we play poker, but in the adult world, you have to pay if you want to play.

Perhaps the 9/11 Un-truth movement would be willing to stake you, greyl?


edited to add - (from the OP) "Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC. Consequently, the National 9/11 Debate date has been moved forward to March 10, 2007.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twist_U_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-13-06 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hi Chall ,Welcome to DU
Now surely you can`t be serious! If the OCTers cant ridicule and call names as a means to try to discredit the Truth Movement, they sure as hell wont get involved in this type arena.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC