Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Erdogan slams Obama for silence on Israel's Gaza flotilla raid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
King_David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 03:55 PM
Original message
Erdogan slams Obama for silence on Israel's Gaza flotilla raid
Turkish premier reiterates Ankara's intent to refer legality of Israel's blockade on Gaza to The Hague, saying the world will see 'who is standing alongside the victims'.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan reiterated on Saturday his country's intent to refer the legality of Israel's Gaza blockade to The Hague, adding a criticism of U.S. President Barack Obama's position regarding Israel's 2010 of a Turkish Gaza-bound flotilla.

Speaking a convention of businessmen in the central Turkish city of Kayseri broadcast live on Turkey's state news channel TRT Erdogan vowed to continue the legal struggle for justice for the nine people killed in the raid.

"We will carry this struggle to The Hague and Erdogan criticizes Obama," the Turkish premier said, criticizing Turkish opposition leaders for what he described as "acting as advocates for Israel."

Erdogan was also deeply critical of the United States position on the Mavi Marmara incident, pointing out that he had to point out to Obama how the attack had left nine Turks dead from wounds inflicted by 35 bullets mostly fired from close range, one of them an American passport holder.

"I asked President Obama whether the reason he showed no interest in one of his nationals being killed was because was Turkish - he didn't reply," said Erdogan.

Edogan's comments came a week Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu first indicated that Turkey was to appeal the International Court of Justice in The Hague as soon as next week in order to probe the legality of Israel's naval blockade on the Gaza Strip, saying that Turkey could not "accept the blockade on Gaza."


http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/erdogan-slams-obama-for-silence-on-israel-s-gaza-flotilla-raid-1.383618
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
King_David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Turkish warships to North America ? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ridiculous assumptions or wishes perhaps? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AwareOne Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Israel is a rogue terrorist state
harboring an illegal nuclear arsenal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
King_David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The blue lady moves slowly in the mist ,as night falls nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Turkey is a rogue terrorist state with a history of genocide
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thats an interesting observation, considering that Turkey is a member nation
of NATO. I hardly think that the other NATO members would agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm also pretty confident NATO members would not say that Israel is a rogue terrorist state
That was what the above poster was responding to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "illegal nuclear arsenal" well that part of his/her post is correct! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. And the "history of genocide" part of the Turkey post is correct as well
Not sure, though, that Israel's nuclear arsenal is illegal.

Under what law would that be the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They have never declared their nukes, and have never signed a non poliferation
treaty. (maybe not illegal as such) but it sure makes one wonder about how they can protest Iran for wanting nukes.

The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, also Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT or NNPT) is a treaty to limit the spread (proliferation) of nuclear weapons. The treaty came into force on 5 March 1970, and currently there are 189 states party to the treaty, five of which are recognized as nuclear weapon states: the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, and China (also the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council).

Four non-parties to the treaty are known or believed to possess nuclear weapons: India, Pakistan and North Korea have openly tested and declared that they possess nuclear weapons, while Israel has had a policy of opacity regarding its own nuclear weapons program. North Korea acceded to the treaty, violated it, and in 2003 withdrew from it.

The NPT consists of a preamble and eleven articles. Although the concept of "pillars" is not expressed anywhere in the NPT, the treaty is nevertheless sometimes interpreted as a three-pillar system, with an implicit balance among them:

non-proliferation,
disarmament, and
the right to peacefully use nuclear technology.<1>

The treaty is reviewed every five years in meetings called Review Conferences of the Parties to the Treaty of Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. In addition, Sessions of the Preparatory Committee for the Review Conference take place on the intermediate years. Simultaneously, many events organized by independent institutions, groups of experts, think tanks and NGOs take place worldwide in order to provide reports and recommendations that complement the Preparatory Committees.<2>

Even though the treaty was originally conceived with a limited duration of 25 years, the signing parties decided, by consensus, to extend the treaty indefinitely and without conditions during the Review Conference in New York City on May 11, 1995.

The most recent Review Conference was held in May 2010.<3>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_Non-Proliferation_Treaty
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Right - so since they didn't seen the NPT then they wouldn't be illegal, right?
Maybe ill-advised but not illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No it is not correct. It is an undeclared and unsupervised arsenal
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I declared the correction in post #10. n/t
Edited on Sat Sep-10-11 05:26 PM by teddy51
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
King_David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. They are not illegal


And they have never been officially declared either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Everybody steps carefully around those ugly facts and the world moves on
Just wanted to remind the prior poster about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-10-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I understand.... And I should make it perfectly clear...
that I have no problem with Israeli's, but I seriously do believe that Benjamin Netanyahu has to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
jimmie Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-11-11 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
17. I quote someone else who said better than I...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC