Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carlo Strenger / The world is sick of Netanyahu's lack of policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 04:24 AM
Original message
Carlo Strenger / The world is sick of Netanyahu's lack of policy
Israel's politicians simply don't get it: The world is sick and tired of the Israeli government's cat and mouse games. Netanyahu's one 'great' move so far has been to utter the words 'Palestinian state' during his foreign policy address at Bar Ilan University in June. For some reason the world did not rejoice and laud him for his enormous political creativity. Accepting a Palestinian State in principle is no breakthrough in 2009: it is, at most, par for the course.

Ever since then, Netanyahu's behavior resembles that of a haggler at the Shuk more than that of a statesman: his major success has been in appeasing his right-wing coalition by not addressing any major policy issues. Instead he has engaged in endless bickering over whether Israel will or won't stop the building in the West Bank settlements, and has effectively prevented any serious peace negotiations.

The cost of Netanyahu's behavior is on the wall in huge letters. Just this week, the White House left Netanyahu hanging until the very last minute, when Netanyahu was already on a plane to Washington, in scheduling his meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama, even though the prime minister's office expressed a desire for this meeting for weeks. The message is clear, and the humiliation is obvious. Nir Hefetz, Netanyahu's media consultant says that there is no crisis between the White House and the Israeli government. That's a matter of semantics. It may indeed not be a crisis, but simply an ever-growing feeling of being sick, tired and somewhat disgusted.

In his recent speech in Hebron, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas expressed what Obama cannot say in public: "What do the Israelis want? They seem not to want the two-state solution; they won't stop settlement expansion; they seem not to want peace." The rather humbling answer to "what does Israel want?" is that Israel has no idea. Netanyahu's associates have an elegant name for this lack of long-term policy: it's now called "managing the conflict."

Of course those on the Right will say that Abbas is merely playing his cards right; that he is just trying to deflect the responsibility for stalled peace process; and they will add "we said it the entire time: Obama is anti-Israel; here you have proof."

Let us be clear, the Palestinians have certainly made their fair share of mistakes, too. Abbas may wonder at night why he didn't accept former prime minister Ehud Olmert's offer, which is probably the best any Israeli Prime Minister will ever present. And of course there is Hamas which continues to refuse to accept Israel's right to exist. But using these Palestinian mistakes as a pretext to maintain the stalemate is a sorry excuse for a lack of policy.

Even Israel's friends no longer buy these excuses for doing nothing except build a few thousand more apartments in the territories.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1127457.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent article!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. so what do you think Nutty should do to get it all started?
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 06:20 AM by shira
and do you think once it starts, he'll offer anything close to what Olmert offered last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. The classic problem with divisive coalition politics.
In order to form a coalition, one must agree not to do anything much. The USA suffers from this weakness often too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Perhaps a benevolent despot would be the best way to go
No need for any progress-stifling compromises!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Violet_Crumble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What's wrong with a LW govt that supports a viable two-state solution?
btw, thanks for posting in the thread I started. What's yr opinion of the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm sure you would be perfect for the job. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't think I'd be all that benevolent
But if there is an opening - I'll take it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. think you'd offer more than Olmert did last year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Have you ever read Bill Clinton's autobiography?
The section about the Camp David negotiations with Barak and Arafat is quite fascinating. I know there are a myriad of different takes on what went down there by various people involved in the negotiations, but I personally believe that was the best chance for a two-state solution agreement that we have seen for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good point, I keep hoping against hope that Obama does not
want to go down as yet another US president to accomplish next to nothing on this conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Israels policy seems to be not to have a policy
the policy of stall and dither seems to be policy, but may I add that I find those including the author of the OP statements that Abbas should have taken Olmerts offer to somewhere between laughable and contemptible as the current PM had promised during his campaign to not honor any deal deals his predecessor had made with the Palestinians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Under Lieberman, Foreign Ministry drops peace initiatives as goal
<snip>

"Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman has set priorities for his ministry that apparently are at odds with those of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

While Netanyahu is trying to convince U.S. President Barack Obama that he is sincere about advancing the peace process on the principle of two states for two peoples, the foreign ministry's written goals don't even mention the word "Palestinians."

<snip>

"Foreign Ministry director general Yossi Gal recently distributed a document detailing the ministry's goals for 2010 to Israeli embassies around the world. The goals are significantly different than those the ministry espoused during previous foreign minister Tzipi Livni's term, especially regarding the peace process.

Netanyahu's Bar-Ilan University speech, outlining his vision for the Middle East and his agreement to establishing a Palestinian state, is hardly reflected at all in the document. Nor are Netanyahu's statements about wanting to renew the talks with Syria and establish diplomatic relations with the Arab states.

The words "Palestinian state," "Syria" or "final status agreement" do not appear in the document.

Under the title heading the list - "strengthening national security" come secondary goals such as managing conflicts, advancing peace agreements and processes, strengthening deterrence, and fighting the delegitimization of Israel.

In Livni's era the ministry's top priorities were advancing the peace process and enlisting moderate Arab states to the process."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1127904.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC