Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NGO: Academic should quit Cast Lead inquiry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
shira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 10:18 PM
Original message
NGO: Academic should quit Cast Lead inquiry
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 10:20 PM by shira
A European non-government organization has called on the UN to remove a British academic from its recent inquiry into alleged human rights, over statements made rejecting Israel's right to self-defense against rocket attacks. Geneva-based UN Watch submitted a 28-page legal brief to the UN last week calling on the UN fact-finding mission to disqualify London School of Economics law professor Christine Chinkin over prior statements she made that bring her impartiality in question.

<snip>

UN Watch was referring to a letter published in the Sunday Times newspaper in January, during Operation Cast Lead, in which Chinkin - an expert in human rights, international and UN law - declares Israel as the aggressor and perpetrator of "war crimes." The letter began by rejecting Israel's right to claim self-defense against Hamas rocket attacks, "deplorable as they are."

While the statement includes a passing reference to crimes committed by Hamas, says UN Watch, the entire statement is devoted to the thesis that Israel was guilty - the very accusations the inquiry is meant to impartially examine, the NGO said.

"International law and the rules of due process require fact-finders in the human rights field to be impartial
," said UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer. "That means being free of any commitment to a preconceived outcome.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1249418678785&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why ask the question when you already "Know" the answer?
Atleast they aren't wasting our time by pretending to not have a preestablished opinion on the matter they are supposed to 'investigate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-25-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. It this were a court of law, a jury trial, that would be a sound argument.
Edited on Tue Aug-25-09 11:08 PM by bemildred
Whether it will hold up in this case, which is neither, remains to be seen. One is not necessarily excluded from "fact finding commissions" because one has already formed opinions. It does leave the commission open to charges of bias, but that seems likely no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC