Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Netanyahu's anti-Obama flak jacket

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 01:39 AM
Original message
Netanyahu's anti-Obama flak jacket
ANALYSIS / Netanyahu's anti-Obama flak jacket

By Yossi Verter


The lead players in our political race pricked up their ears to hear the words "actively and aggressively," which U.S. President Barack Obama used to describe his policy in the Middle East.

Tzipi Livni was the first to take advantage of the wording. Do we want to return to the Bibi days, between '96 and '99, with his problematic conduct toward the U.S., she demanded last week?

Netanyahu cannot change the past. It is engraved in newspaper archives and biographies written by top Clinton administration officials. But he argues that things have changed. Today, both Obama and Hillary Clinton understand that the solution lies in a more gradual and cautious approach. Kadima's election broadcast cites Dennis Ross, one of Clinton's men, blasting Netanyahu. But Netanyahu has an essay Ross wrote in the Wall Street Journal about 18 months ago that calls on Bush's administration not to rush into a "far-reaching" agreement but to invest in developing the economy in the territories. That is, in fact, the "economic peace" I'm talking about, Netanyahu says.

<snip>

Perhaps in the next elections, in two years or so, after a right-wing-ultra-Orthodox government reigns with Netanyahu, Lieberman, Begin, Ya'alon, Yishai and Orlev, the penny will finally drop.

Netanyahu understands this very well. He knows this is his last chance. He does not want to leave the stage humiliated and outcast, as he did 10 years ago. So his strategic goal, if he is elected, is to add Labor and Kadima or either one to his party, as an anti-Obama flak jacket.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1058447.html

Bibi and Lieberman :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. How are opinion polls running?
I've been remiss in my mid-eastern studies. I've heard rumours that the Israeli population is very strongly pro-war. Also that generally speaking they want to prove something to themselves, some redemption for 2006 where the aftermath didn't go as planned. The US is still sending Israel as much munitions as US factories can handle. The US is still the world's greatest arms dealer. It still profits mightily from fomenting war. I don't think the US population is much aware of how what little is left of the US economy depends on financing the machineries of war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Info from the latest poll
Likud - 28
Kadima - 24
Labor - 16
Beteinu - 16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see how you reconcile "active and aggressive" with "gradual and cautious".
As an argument, it does not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I vote for active and aggressive
It's interesting to note that Obama has sent Mitchell over there even before the Israeli elections are held.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think he meant what he said.
Talk is much cheaper than action, but nevertheless that was not a bullshit speech.

I do think that people that consider that Israel controls the US should also consider how instantly getting along with Obama became an issue in the election after Obama's inaugural speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC