is an example of an attitude that is certainly not mutual respect.
Whatever political formulation is eventually put together to end this wretched conflict, it can only be durable and lasting if people are willing to accept the others as their equals. Arab people already know that the western world - including Israel - has many technical, educational, political, economic and social advancements that they can only envy but cannot match at this time in history. But constantly rubbing it in with insults upon insults upon insults does nothing but produce resentment and frustration. This attitude is exactly what mutual respect is not.
All the military power in the world cannot out muscle geography and demographics forever. If Israel truly wants security, they can only achieve it by acceptance by the Arab world and integration into the region. This is only possible if Israel is willing to accept the Arab world and deal with Arab world as human beings of equal worth and equally deserving of respect and dignity. This is not simply a nice ideal. This is an absolute requirement for the long term security and even survival of the Israeli people. Without this mutual acceptance, Israeli is just holding off the flood gates of the inevitable, which can be done for a time, but not forever.
As far as recognition of Israel by Hamas is concerned, nobody is suggesting that Likud or any Israeli political parties that is included or might be included in a future Israeli government, must first recognize the Palestinian State with East Jerusalem as its capital, based on the 1967 border. If Palestinians were to throw up that requirement, everyone would say that they were being unreasonable.
For that matter there are political parties all over the world that hold all kinds of theoretical positions, but this does not prevent them from sharing power. Sein Fein in Northern Ireland still does not recognize the right of British sovereignty over the Northern counties and still openly advocates full unification of all of Ireland. But they still manage to share power in governments that include staunch Unionist.
Please allow me to quote what former Israeli Foreign Minister, Shlomo Ben-Ami said in regards to Hamas:
SHLOMO BEN-AMI: Yes, Hamas. I think that in my view there is almost sort of poetic justice with this victory of Hamas. After all, what is the reason for this nostalgia for Arafat and for the P.L.O.? Did they run the affairs of the Palestinians in a clean way? You mentioned the corruption, the inefficiency. Of course, Israel has contributed a lot to the disintegration of the Palestinian system, no doubt about it, but their leaders failed them. Their leaders betrayed them, and the victory of Hamas is justice being made in many ways. So we cannot preach democracy and then say that those who won are not accepted by us. Either there is democracy or there is no democracy.
And with these people, I think they are much more pragmatic than is normally perceived. In the 1990s, they invented the concept of a temporary settlement with Israel. 1990s was the first time that Hamas spoke about a temporary settlement with Israel. In 2003, they declared unilaterally a truce, and the reason they declared the truce is this, that with Arafat, whose the system of government was one of divide and rule, they were discarded from the political system. Mahmoud Abbas has integrated them into the political system, and this is what brought them to the truce. They are interested in politicizing themselves, in becoming a politic entity. And we need to try and see ways where we can work with them.
Now, everybody says they need first to recognize the state of Israel and end terrorism. Believe me, I would like them to do so today, but they are not going to do that. They are eventually going to do that in the future, but only as part of a quid pro quo, just as the P.L.O. did it. The P.L.O., when Rabin came to negotiate with them, also didn't recognize the state of Israel, and they engaged in all kind of nasty practices. And therefore, we need to be much more realistic and abandon worn-out cliches and see whether we can reach something with these people. I believe that a long-term interim agreement between Israel and Hamas, even if it is not directly negotiated between the parties, but through a third party, is feasible and possible.
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=140