AIPAC's Hold (The Nation)

[norml]

Opinion
AIPAC's Hold

Ari Berman
Fri Aug 4, 12:00 AM ET

The Nation -- In early March, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its forty-seventh annual conference in Washington. AIPAC's executive director spent twenty-seven minutes reading the "roll call" of dignitaries present at the gala dinner, which included a majority of the Senate and a quarter of the House, along with dozens of Administration officials.

As this event illustrates, it's impossible to talk about Congress's relationship to Israel without highlighting AIPAC, the American Jewish community's most important voice on the Hill. The Congressional reaction to Hezbollah's attack on Israel and Israel's retaliatory bombing of Lebanon provide the latest example of why.

On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution "condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel's exercise of its right to self-defense." After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging "all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure," the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. "They were given a resolution by AIPAC," said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. "They didn't prepare one."

AIPAC is the leading player in what is sometimes referred to as "The Israel Lobby"--a coalition that includes major Jewish groups, neoconservative intellectuals and Christian Zionists. With its impressive contacts among Hill staffers, influential grassroots supporters and deep connections to wealthy donors, AIPAC is the lobby's key emissary to Congress. But in many ways, AIPAC has become greater than just another lobby; its work has made unconditional support for Israel an accepted cost of doing business inside the halls of Congress. AIPAC's interest, Israel's interest and America's interest are today perceived by most elected leaders to be one and the same. Christian conservatives increasingly aligned with AIPAC demand unwavering support for Israel from their Republican leaders. (In mid-July, 3,000-plus evangelicals came to town for the first annual "Christian United for Israel" summit.) And Democrats are equally concerned about alienating Jewish voters and Jewish donors--long a cornerstone of their party. Some in Congress are deeply uncomfortable with AIPAC's militant worldview and heavyhanded tactics, but most dare not say so publicly.


snip


http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20060804/cm_thenation/20060814aipacs_hold

[breakaleg]

1. This is disturbing. It scares me to think that any lobby group can

have that much power on a government. But at least it explains the support at all costs approach of the US government at the moment.

[IndianaGreen]

2. There is such a thing as a backlash!

The fascist Pat Buchanan was ranting today about the need for "An American Middle East Policy," a topic that is ripe for discussion among rightwing isolationists. Buchanan could find a sympathetic audience in the left as well, for his opposition was to the disproportionate response by Israel in Lebanon. As Buchanan said, had Israel gone against Hezbollah, she would have kept the high moral ground, but by going against all of Lebanon, Israel is harming American interests in the region and putting moderates in peril.

[physioex]

3. True enough....

I can't stand Buchanan but this is one issue we can find common ground.....