Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Times: Request for an Emergency Rule on Border Gun Sales Is Denied

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:22 PM
Original message
New York Times: Request for an Emergency Rule on Border Gun Sales Is Denied
Edited on Sat Feb-05-11 05:22 PM by slackmaster
The Obama Administration has done less harm to the right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms than either Bush administration did. The administration comprehends that the situation on the border is neither new nor a crisis that demands immediate action. That's the kind of cool-headed leadership that our country needs.

By THE NEW YORK TIMES
Published: February 4, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Friday rejected a request for an emergency rule requiring gun dealers along the Mexican border to report bulk sales of assault rifles, a proposal intended to make it harder for drug cartels to smuggle weapons.

The White House told the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives that gunrunning to Mexico was a continuing problem, rather than the kind of fast-moving emergency that justified an exception to the normal process for reviewing proposed regulations....


For full copyrighted article, please go to:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/05/us/05guns.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thaddeus_flowe Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't just report bulk sales of assault rifles,
make them illegal altogether.
hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Assault rifles have been strictly regulated since 1934
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thaddeus_flowe Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. thanks for the atf page.
Still feeling a completely reasonable amount of distaste for assault rifles.
Especially those sold legally to drug cartels...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No firearm in the US sporting arms market has ever been sold legally to a Mexican drug cartel
Look up the term "straw purchase".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katya Mullethov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. What about all the guns from Carter's Country Guns ?
That is sort of a gray area .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. If you're talking about civilian "assault weapons"---
Edited on Sat Feb-05-11 06:26 PM by benEzra
i.e. non-automatic, civilian-legal rifles with modern styling---then you run into the little problem that (1) rifles are the least misused weapons in the United States, and (2) you're talking about banning the most popular sporting rifles and HD carbines in the country.

Also, as I understand it, the BATFE proposed rule would have affected all self-loading rifles regardless of how the stock was shaped; it wasn't limited to "assault weapons", however you define them. Also, the definition of "bulk" was IIRC decidedly non-bulk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I seriously doubt
that anything sold along the border are assault rifles, bulk or otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Better notify the gungeon.
They're convinced he's gonna come get your guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It may have escaped your attention, but I posted this in the Gungeon
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. aka, we're not going to do via executive fiat for rifles what took a law in 1968 for handguns..
Good call!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Reagan and the 2 Bushes as Republicans were de-facto assumed to support RKBA but Obama has to run
away from the gun-grabber image that many voters associate with we Democrats and even worse his own record of voting against and working against RKBA.

Your statement "Obama Administration has done less harm to the right of law-abiding Americans to keep and bear arms than either Bush administration did" doesn't surprise me however he still hasn't clearly repudiated the anti-RKBA rhetoric of Holder, Napolitano, and other close supporters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC