|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:40 PM Original message |
Is it ever ok to shoot at a person who not a threat? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertFlower (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. i'm also a gun owner and i |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
virgogal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Of course it's not okay--------silly question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tim01 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Gun owner here. Absolutely not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. Never fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. I personally think its ok, but still not legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
115. Wow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. Apparently in Pasadena, Texas, it's okay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Do you see much of that attitude here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Actually, yes- it's implied rather frequently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:46 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Do you have any links? I haven't seen a single serious post like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. It appears there's some misunderstanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
50. That sounds like projection.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:02 PM Response to Reply #50 |
60. Wrong word and concept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:37 PM Response to Reply #60 |
66. You ascribe desire. Yet you speak of things being implied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:48 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Anyone who reads between the lines (or actually just reads) some comments gets the implication |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. If it's so prevalent, should be easy to find one to quote.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #68 |
99. I'd like to "read" some cites, some examples. (chirp, chirp) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:49 AM Response to Reply #60 |
98. Hhhhhhh-h-h-h-h! Hhh--h-h-h-h. He said "seem to be." Seems to you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 12:23 AM Response to Reply #60 |
120. Insulting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:35 AM Response to Reply #33 |
93. Actions speak louder than words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
95. Hhh-h-h-h, Hhhh-h-h-h. He said "implied." Cites? Sources? "Borderedon?" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #33 |
108. I think what it may be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:11 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Deleted message |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. When my dad showed me how to shoot his pistol, he also made it clear that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aliendroid (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
81. that's part of the rules of gun ownership. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. The police in most jurisdictions in Calif. seem to think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
54. Another example of the dangers of taking your troubles to the altar of the state for resolution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. I can't think of any realistic scenarios in which it would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
farmout rightarm (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. I can't think of an example but "never say never" comes to mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Caballero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. It is never okay to shoot someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. So, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. Deleted message |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. So it's wrong to shoot someone who is about to murder a small child? That's your position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don Caballero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
48. My position is quite simple really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Did this notion just come to you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. Let me show you how you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PavePusher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:25 PM Response to Reply #48 |
64. Well, it is quite established by now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 09:04 PM Response to Reply #48 |
70. Fortunately we have a Constitution that says differently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cognoscere (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
107. Yes, it is. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TPaine7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
55. You're funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
100. Did you see Post #9 above? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoopla Phil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
13. I can't think of one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
14. I wouldn't ever run a red light. I wouldn't every speed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneTenthofOnePercent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Saying it's never OK to do it and saying you would never do it are two different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfranklin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. The question was not about whether you would lose control of yourself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. In 25 years of owning firearms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:01 PM Response to Reply #19 |
59. You are lucky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
27. I have been around guns all my life, and I am now a senior citizen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TPaine7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
35. I guess we can trust you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
38. So I guess you don't drive anymore right? You wouldn't want to endanger the public would you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
40. You are confusing accidents and deliberate evil acts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:42 PM Response to Reply #40 |
67. I'm not in favor of gun bans. I just think people should realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #67 |
94. About those "heat of passion" murders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #67 |
96. You do realize your cited reference is a 9th grader's school project, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:34 PM Response to Reply #96 |
117. Have you ever talked to a person who "made a mistake" with a gun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:41 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Drawing a gun on anyone can't be classified as just a "mistake". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 11:12 AM Response to Reply #118 |
125. Yes. When a person with poor judgment gets excited and just reacts, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 05:31 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. Drawing a gun is a deliberate act, it is not using baking soda instead of baking powder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 09:13 PM Response to Reply #117 |
128. Fascinating, but not particularly relevant to my points above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-18-10 03:21 AM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Spend a few weeks sitting around criminal courts. You might learn a lot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-18-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #129 |
130. To paraphrase Han Solo, "I can believe quite a bit." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
58. Nobody ever said mistakes are not made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 09:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
71. And I'd never deliberately run over someone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:08 PM Response to Reply #14 |
101. Follow Eleanor's example: she packed. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
17. It's never ok, sometimes it's just unavoidable. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. Johnny Cash used to sing about this guy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
102. A Johnny Cash song. Sure beats the "Gunsmoke" sources used by gun-controllers. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
21. Sure, just come to Texas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Illegal forced entry into an occupied dwelling is not a "flimsy excuse". N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. No, it isn't. However, the precise level of threat can be difficult to determine at times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. How reassuring. Your ability to shoot whomever you want for any or no reason is my concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:25 PM Response to Reply #25 |
32. I perfectly capable of deciding who is a grave threat and who is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:32 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Unless you happen to be suffering from a glioma which sends you up to the top of a clock tower. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:44 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. I guess that's a chance you'll have to take. Don't worry though I feel fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
61. Or through a farmers market in a half ton pickup? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. The principal use of the pickup at the farmers market is to haul goods. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. It's "principle." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 09:26 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. No, I think you were to eager to correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 07:57 AM Response to Reply #72 |
87. Third definition from Mirriam Webster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aliendroid (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:54 PM Response to Reply #63 |
84. yet the pickup has the higher risk factor for killing a human being. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #63 |
104. So? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aliendroid (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:49 PM Response to Reply #37 |
83. more anecdotal evidence for your cause |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #37 |
97. In the history of the country, that has happened how many times? Once. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:51 PM Response to Reply #25 |
44. You are incorrect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:04 PM Response to Reply #44 |
62. "Needlessly" is entirely subjective. The measure of need is for the shooter to decide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 08:56 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. "Needlessly" is not entirely subjective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:12 PM Response to Reply #62 |
77. GLORY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
56. I'm glad the we don't live in the world you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aliendroid (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
82. so based on your argument... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
103. Shares, you really just don't trust people. But you have to in a democracy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
31. And yet, non-threatening people get shot every day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:28 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Do you have any statistics to back that up? and..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:57 PM Response to Reply #31 |
46. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire_Medic_Dave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
36. One possible exception would be.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doc03 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
39. I agree and I am a CCW holder. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
42. The judgment of "posing an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm" is obviously subjective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike K (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
45. My decision in this question - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike K (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
47. If this is strictly a moral question - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gorfle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
52. Yes. It is OK to shoot people in defense of property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aliendroid (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:42 PM Response to Reply #52 |
80. if someone is in your home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 06:18 AM Response to Reply #52 |
86. Let me ask some questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gorfle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:16 AM Response to Reply #86 |
92. Each situation would have to be looked at individually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Callisto32 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
53. The initiation of force is always wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:16 PM Response to Reply #53 |
78. +1 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 10:39 PM Response to Original message |
74. No. Period. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
75. How many times ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Glassunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
76. Only... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aliendroid (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-15-10 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
79. I'm a gun nut and I plan to try to avoid ever shooting someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
85. Perhaps someone who is fleeing with one or more stolen firearms? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
88. You mean, like.....for FUN? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crispini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
89. What about IMAGINED threats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 05:27 PM Response to Reply #89 |
116. IMAGINED threats, No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
90. strawman: "Many gun prohibitionists seem to think gun enthusiasts just want to shoot someone" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #90 |
105. Concerning "gun prohibitionists." There are more than you think... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. this is taking the other side's position to an implausible extreme. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
X_Digger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Had there not been a demonstrated link between one kind of gun being banned to another.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 01:59 AM Response to Reply #112 |
121. That's just the problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
91. We had a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteveM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
106. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
109. Here's an example |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. If you think people who comment on news media articles form a representative sample... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 03:14 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. But we agree that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Euromutt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 08:21 AM Response to Reply #114 |
122. No, we do not agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 10:59 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Can't say I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 11:18 AM Response to Reply #122 |
126. The "store your gun at a gun club" argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrfoot (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
111. If we're ONLY having a hypothetical debate about a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Katya Mullethov (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-17-10 09:00 AM Response to Reply #111 |
123. Body language it's all about the body language |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtheistCrusader (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-16-10 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
119. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC